What is Taqiyya?

Taqiyya تقية (alternate spellings taqiyeh,taqiya, taqiyah, tuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation,[1] or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are at risk of significant persecution.[2]


All religions are not same. Telling all religions same is Taqiyya. I do not say. Koran says, “...The only religion in the sight of God is Islam...” (Koran 3:19). “If anyone desires a religion other than Islam, never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter, he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (their selves in the Hellfire).” (Koran 3:85)

Here are other evidences from Koran,

 [Koran 3:28] The believers should not take the unbelievers as guides in preference to the believers he who does this does not belong to Allah in anything, unless you have a fear of them (Kafirs). Allah warns you to be cautious of Him, the arrival is to Allah.

 [Koran 16:106] Whosoever disbelieves in Allah after believing except he who is forced while his heart remains in his belief but he who opens his chest for disbelief, shall receive the Anger of Allah and for such awaits a mighty punishment.

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves." 

Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..."  The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture.  They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts"  The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur'an (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths"

Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers."  The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit.  If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.

From the Hadith:


Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'"  The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).


Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."  Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.


Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."


Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."


Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence.  The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad.  This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.


From Islamic Law:


Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) -  "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it.  When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression...


"One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.



Additional Notes:

Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them.  The two forms are:


Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true.


Kitman - Lying by omission.  An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief." 


Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover.  The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the treaty two years later, and some of the people in the city who had trusted him at his word were executed. 


Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to trick his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves to slaughter by pretending to seek peace.  This happened in the case of Ka'b bin al-Ashraf (as previously noted) and again later against Usayr ibn Zarim, a surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe, which had been evicted from their home in Medina by the Muslims.


At the time, Usayr ibn Zarim was attempting to gather an armed force against the Muslims from among a tribe allied with the Quraish (against which Muhammad had already declared war).  Muhammad's "emissaries" went to ibn Zarim and persuaded him to leave his safe haven on the pretext of meeting with the prophet of Islam in Medina to discuss peace.  Once vulnerable, the leader and his thirty companions were massacred by the Muslims with ease, belying the probability that they were mostly unarmed, having been given a guarantee of safe passage (Ibn Ishaq 981).


Such was the reputation of Muslims for lying and then killing that even those who "accepted Islam" did not feel entirely safe.  The fate of the Jadhima is tragic evidence for this.  When Muslim "missionaries" approached their tribe one of the members insisted that they would be slaughtered even though they had already "converted" to Islam to avoid just such a demise.  However, the others were convinced that they could trust the Muslim leader's promise that they would not be harmed if they simply offered no resistance.  (After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms, the unarmed men of the tribe were quickly tied up and beheaded - Ibn Ishaq 834 & 837).


Today's Muslims often try to justify Muhammad's murder of poets and others who criticized him at Medina by saying that they broke a treaty by their actions.  Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties broken by Muslims.  From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.


Leaders in the Arab world routinely say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic.  Yassir Arafat was famous for telling Western newspapers about his desire for peace with Israel, then turning right around and whipping Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.


The 9/11 hijackers practiced deception by going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad.  This effort worked so well, in fact, that even weeks after 9/11, John Walsh, the host of a popular American television show, said that their bar trips were evidence of 'hypocrisy.'


The transmission from Flight 93 records the hijackers telling their doomed passengers that there is "a bomb on board" but that everyone will "be safe" as long as "their demands are met."  Obviously none of these things were true, but these men, who were so intensely devoted to Islam that they were willing to "slay and be slain for the cause of Allah" (as the Qur'an puts it) saw nothing wrong with employing Taqiyya in order to facilitate their mission of mass murder.


The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it "has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization."  In fact, it was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and has bankrolled Hamas.  At least nine founders or board members of ISNA have been accused by prosecutors of supporting terrorism.

Non believer (Kafirs) need to know some simple facts about Islam. People assume Islam is just another religion like their own and this is fatal mistake. I take some simple facts, besides others, about Islam to show my contention.

Three simple fact about Islam for non believers (Kafirs)

All religions are not same.

1. Muslims apply Taqiyya (Koran 3:28 and 16:106) to make non-Muslims believe that their religion is being hijacked by some misguided Muslims. However, Islam is not being hijacked. ‘Islam has been hijacked’ is what non-Muslims naturally assume because they assume all religions are the same. So they further assume that some crazies must have hijacked the religion because surely no religion would actually encourage the killing of innocents. Once non-Muslim people realize that it is not true, non-Muslims would start seeking real solutions.

2. Allah and his Islam allow Muslims to deceive non-Muslims, if it helps Islam. The dogma of taqiyya is unknown to non-Muslims. Knowledge of the principle would help immunize non-Muslims from the deception. They would at least not take everything a Muslim leader says as true. You can see (and share) some excellent examples of taqiyya in the movie, Obsession.

3. Through the principle of taqiyya (Koran 3:28 and 16:106) or otherwise to keep striving to institute worldwide Shari'a law, until all governments have been converted to Shari'a law, is a religious duty of a Muslim and unfettered fundamental right provided by the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution. Most people don't realize how politically-oriented Islam is at its core. Shari'a is the law of Allah. Any other form of government is a sin. Muslims have accepted servility of their rulers, which has been given to the rulers by Muhammad as legacy. Allah is fabrication of Muhammad. I think when kafirs understand the fact; they would immediately grasp the basic principle that all governments must immediately stop propagation of Islam.

4. Since Christians and Muslims accept servility, like bullock and sheep of peasant, which is the basic requirement of rulers, they are getting full support and protection from the rulers.

Another Taqiyya

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful? Almost every chapter of Koran, the scripture of Islam, starts with the very slogan. This is most stunning example of taqiyya.

Allah is the worst terrorist (Koran 8:12) and predator (Koran 8:1, 41 and 69) . Allah himself kills Kafirs. (Koran 8:17). Allah is neither gracious, nor merciful.

Yet another Taqiyya

AsSalaam O Alaikum (Peace be always with you. AMEEN.)

Peace Is taboo in Islam. Allah is war monger.

"Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you knew not." Al-Baqarah (Koran 2:216)

(Koran, al-Anfal 8:65]

"O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you 20 steadfast, they will overcome 200 and if there be of you a 100, they shall overcome a 1000, because the disbelievers are a folk without intelligence"

"It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. You desire the lure of this world and Allah desires for you the hereafter and Allah is Mighty, Wise. (Koran, al-Anfal 8:67)




Muslims' Allah and his Islam have divided humanity between Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad. (Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and properties.

Yet another Taqiyya

Islam is a religion of peace and co-existence, wherein there is ample scope for freedom of expression. You can express your views even if you differ. The decision is arrived at through consensus in all important matters.

Religion of peace?

The Warfare/Qitaal is ordained upon Muslims in situations of self-defense to guard oneself (Let humanity know as to who was killing Muhammad in Badr?). It is not prescribed for conversion purposes. [What (Koran 33:61) says?]

For opposing mosques and Azaan, our 9 officers are in jail.

Islam requires Muslims to feel enmity toward non-Muslims (upheld by taqiyya, or deception) and exhibit loyalty to the umma, or the Muslim community.  It embodies the stealth principles of Sun Tzu's ancient Chinese war doctrine: "[s]ubduing an enemy without force is best" and "[a]ll warfare is based on deception."  

Religion of co-existence?

Muslims' Allah and his Islam has divided humanity between Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad. (Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and properties. Where is co-existence in Islam?

You can express your views even if you differ?

I quote Lord Buddha.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your reason and your own common sense."

In contrast,

The radical weakness of Judaism, Christianity & Islam as moral philosophies lie in their eradication of the individual conscience of humanity in favor of unthinking submission to the mere letter of revealed law. The long cherished moral, liberty of faith, right to property, chastity and dignity of women are snatched in lieu of booty and sex. The Bible, Koran and Sunnah (example of Mohammed) stand above reason, conscience, or nature. A thing is right - including acts and laws abhorrent to "superseded" or "irrelevant" natural morality - simply because Jehovah, Jesus and Allah say so, or because the prophets have thus said or done. The lack of any pretense to a moral basis for Bible or Sharia (Islamic law) is open and explicit: there is no "spirit of the law" in Christianity and Islam, no rationality behind it for human reason to discover by exercising man's God- given intellect. There is no discernment of the consequences of deeds, and revelation and traditions must not be questioned. Nor may any other standard of good and evil - least of all any notion of "natural" justice such as that assumed by the founding documents of our Veds or Manusmriti - be invoked.

Torah, Bible and Sharia cannot be penetrated by reason (its apparent inconsistencies notwithstanding) and the very attempt is forbidden heresy. It's blasphemy and attracts death penalty in Islamic and Christian countries and punishment u/s 153 and 295 of the Indian Penal Code. Every Jew, Christian or Moslem, who is qualified to give a sound opinion on matters of Torah, Bible or Sharia, is entitled to interpret the application of Torah, Sharia or Bible when such interpretation becomes necessary, but where an explicit command of Jehovah, Jesus and Allah or Prophets already exists, no rabbi, Pope, Father, Gideon, Cleric or Mufti, Aalim, Moslem leader or legislature can form an independent judgment. Since Muhammad is the final prophet, there can be no further development in any judicial matters where the Koran and Sunnah provide guidance. This deeply undermines the possibility of rational civic debate in Moslem Christian nations and accounts for the distinctly inhuman flavor of their legal systems.

The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated  a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets are slaves of their prophets. In lieu of providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets get killed those who do not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world comes under the control of the prophets. However these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

Do Christians not feel ashamed that they worship a criminal god, who has snatched their liberty, wisdom and manhood (Christians believe that they are sheep)?

Our children will ask 'what did our forefathers do', and their answer will be-they did nothing."

No sooner, one accepts Islam, Judaism, Christianity, and Socialism, the criminal activities of murder, plunder, incest and rape of women ceased to be considered crimes instead these crimes turn into the source of sustenance and heaven after death for these criminal democrats, Communists, Muslims, and Christians.

However, in contrast, there is Vedic Sanskriti. It grants liberty of worship of god of one’s choice. (Gita 7:21). Supports one's right to property. (Manusmriti 8:308).

Islam means submission, while humanity is fighting for liberty, Muslims are becoming human bombs for servility of Allah.

The vast preponderance of ignorant Jews, Christians and Muslims do not know their prophet or their religion. They lead a life of ignorance, despair, tyranny, and mind-numbing rituals. They are kept in the dark, purposely deceived, for the benefit of clerics and kings. There is no incentive for Muslims and Christians to learn. Even if exposed to the truth, they would not reject Islam (Koran 4:89) or Jesus (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) for fear of their lives. The Koran of Muslims and the Bible of Christians themselves confirm these startling realities. Allah commanded Muslims “not to question the Koran,” for those who did, he said, “discarded their religion.” (Koran 5:101 and 102). They may test this fact by asking for their civil rights. They would realize that doors of heaven have been closed for them.

Where is the liberty promised by the Indian and US Constitution in their preambles? While humanity is fighting relentless war for liberty, public servants, Jews, Christians, Muslims, and most human races have no shame that they have voluntarily relinquished their liberty, wisdom and manhood in lieu of booty and sex. (Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41), (Bible, Isaiah 13:16) and (Bible, Genesis 2:17). They have no shame that they are becoming human bombs and fighting to retain their servilities of Jehovah, Jesus, Allah, rulers, clerics, dead Socialists, Communists and Democrats. Jehovah, Jesus, Allah, rulers, clerics, dead Socialists, Communists and Democrats have snatched the very instinct for liberty from their followers. Look! Still Jews, Christians and Muslims do not feel sorry that they are getting cheated, corrupted and humiliated by their so called merciful Allah, Jesus, Jehovah, clerics and rulers. They are happily defending their servilities in lieu of booty and sex.

The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those, who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets become slaves of their prophets. By providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets got killed those who did not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world came under the control of the prophets. The prophets died and left behind their legacies to clerics and rulers. Why should one believe? Why not one search Ishwar either by Yog or Kundalini Jagran? However, these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)?

If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits? If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves?

Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay and rob the people of alien faiths and rape their women? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties of the citizens?

Stopping the critiques through section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Section 196 of the CrPC

This section was compiled by the Britishers in 1860 AD with double purpose. While the section deprives public, police and judiciary from filing any complaint or trying any accused, who commits offence u/s 108, 153, 295 or 505, it simultaneously provides authority to Government to punish and harass those, who protest against abuse and insult of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram as well as deprives one from exercising one’s right of private defense provided by sections 102 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 196 of the CrPC

 Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence.

(1) No court shall take cognizance of-

(a) Any offence punishable under Chapter VI or under section 153A, 1[section 295A or sub-section (1) of section 505] of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or

punishable under sections 153/295 of the Indian Penal Code

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, or

(c) Any such abetment, as is described in section 108A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), except with the previous sanction of the central Government or of the State Government.

2[(1A) No court shall take cognizance of -

(a) Any offence punishable under section 153B or sub-section (2) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) of section 505 of the Indian Panel Code (45 of 1860), or

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence,

Except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or of the State Government or of the District Magistrate.]

(2) No court shall take cognizance of the offence of any criminal conspiracy punishable under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), other than a criminal conspiracy to commit 3[an offence] punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, unless the State Government or the District Magistrate has consented in writing to the initiation of the proceeding:

Provided that where the criminal conspiracy is one to which the provisions of section 195 apply, no such consent shall be necessary.

(3) The Central Government or the State Government may, before according sanction 4[under sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A) and the District Magistrate may, before according sanction under sub-section (1A)] and the State Government or the District Magistrate may, before giving consent under sub-section (2), order a preliminary investigation by a police officer not being below the rank of Inspector, in which case such police officer shall have the powers referred to in sub-section (3) of section 155.

1. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3, for "section 153B, section 295A or section 505" (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

2. Ins. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3 (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

3. Subs. by Act 45 of 1979, sec. 16, for "a cognizable offence" (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).

4. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3, for "under sub-section (1)" (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

Invoking "Islamophobia" and "Blasphemy" through taqiyya.

Another key tactic cited in the Sonia’s strategic plan to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dhram is to prevent infidels (Kafirs) from learning the truth about Islam by controlling how Islamic doctrine is discussed and the language used to describe Islam and Muslims.  This method is effectively aided by the India's culture of multiculturalism, in which charges of prejudice and racism -- like "Islam phobia" -- trump all offenses.

The all too convenient charge of "Islam phobia" has been proclaimed when non-Muslims have critically evaluated the tenets of Islam, denounced terrorist activities, called attention to inappropriate or threatening behavior, denied requests for accommodations beyond what is customary and normal, depicted Mohammed in unflattering ways, or even quoted directly from Islamic scriptures. 

Example of religious hate crime is Azaan and preaching of genocide of Kafirs from mosques. It lulls the general populace and renders it helpless to defend itself against the real Islamic threat.  

A parallel move, used when actual Islamic terrorist actions have been taken, is to shift the blame for those actions onto non-Muslims.  Thus, those who have expressed negative views of Islam and Muslims and who have cast suspicions about Muslims' activities are deemed culpable for Islamic terrorism.  Further, Sonia’s public servants issue veiled threats that the targeting and misrepresentation of Muslims will lead to distrust within Muslim communities and foster an unwillingness to cooperate with authorities to strengthen homeland security. 

A related diversionary tactic is to blame jihadist acts on social or economic problems such as poverty, lack of opportunity, and bias against Muslims.  In effect, the argument goes, Islamic terrorism is being manufactured by Islam phobia or poverty and has nothing to do with Islam.  The victims of Malegaon bomb blast is blamed for its insensitivity to Islam, and the need for formalized measures or legislation is advanced to ensure that infidels aren't harmed further by violent reactions when Muslims legitimately feel disrespected. However, they would keep on disrespecting Kafirs and their religion. Legislation such as the Istanbul Process, the collection of anti-blasphemy laws passed by the U.N., is presented as a necessary option under the guise of condemning insults to religion in general.  Yet the real intent is to eliminate any criticism of Islam, as is made obvious by the regular and public condemnation of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram through Azaan and preaching from mosques by Muslims, who populate the internet with videos calling for jihad against infidels. 

Advancing fatal dogmas

Another arrow in the quiver of Muslim tactics is to seize control of the education of military and government employees about Islamic doctrine.  Sonia’s public servants do this by arguing that non-Muslims are unequipped to teach Islam and that it must properly be taught by Muslims.  As a result, Sonia has provided Muslim sensitivity training for law enforcing departments. Even Armed Forces, state and local law enforcement agencies, and others, all of it are trained under the guise of fostering a "better relationship between law enforcement and the Muslim community."  Yet at the same time, Jihadis distributed posters declaring, "Build a Wall of Resistance, Don't Talk to the C.B.I." and advised Muslims that they are the victims of anti-Muslim bias. 

Monitoring news reports and media portrayals

Managing the image of Muslims portrayed in the media is another aspect of the Islamic inside-influence operation to prevent accurate knowledge of the enemy.  Threats of violence and boycotts and the brandishing of financial clout have been used against the media to alter the message about Islam, mute any potential criticism or negative inference, and blunt attempts to educate the public about a very real threat.

Media spin management is yet another aspect of the jihad that keeps non-Muslims in the dark about Islamic terrorist activities.  The spin is managed by Sonia herself through Muslim front organizations.  For example, shortly after 26/11/2008 attack in Mumbai, Muslim leaders aggressively importuned the producers of the TV show, which portrayed terrorists  as Muslims.  Sonia pressured even Bollywood to change the villains from Muslims to Hindu terrorists in films.

Ignorance and silence

The shutting down of military and government training, the close monitoring of news reports and media portrayals, the advancing of false theories, the use of free speech-curtailing anti-blasphemy legislation, and the denial of jihadist terrorism as an integral part of Islam and portraying Islam as “religion of peace" -- are all tactics used in the service of keeping infidels totally in the dark about the true nature of the Jihad are well in place to defeat them (Kafirs). 

As apocryphal as crying wolf, false cries of blasphemy serve a sinister purpose -- to shut down any and all productive dialogue on the true nature of the threat faced by humanity.  The goal is to ensure ignorance and induce complacency so that the supremacist, misogynist, discriminatory, and totalitarian nature of Islam is not known and Muslims can commit genocide of Kafirs.

A fitting quote by an intelligence analyst best sums up the situation:

“It is important to understand how effective this operation has been.  I know of no one in the U.S. government who can speak out publicly or privately against Islamists, radical Islamists or militant Islamists.  The operations targeting the National Defense University, the Joint Forces Staff College and the FBI has effectively censored everyone.  You will NOT find any documentation censoring anyone and all the academic institutions will claim, and back up in writing, academic freedom, but, unfortunately, the message has already been sent - do not say anything unless it has been approved by CAIR, MPAC and the other Muslim Brotherhood organizations.”

Rulers, Judges, Governors, Leaders, reformers, saints, Media, Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving humanity. The truth is not hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. The perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed with violent and racist doctrines. The doctrines are, “Fight them (non-Muslims) until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both have agenda, and Human races are ignorant of it.

Christians and Muslims would continue to wage Jihad and Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivation is Koran and Bible. (Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). Non-violence is imposed upon Aryans only through [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and Sections 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. If we don’t retaliate, they would keep on killing Humanity.

Dear reader. You are on cross road and have no choice. You are given an Indian Constitution to ensure your Genocide and eradication of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram. ARYAVRT wishes to get you rid of it. Are you willing to face challenge?

We, the followers of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram, warn the human race for impending danger of extinction of human race; because we have threat from the Indian Constitution itself, the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution of which provides unfettered fundamental right to Christian and Muslim to slay each other as well as those, who are neither Christian nor Muslim.


Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi.