Slave Culture

THE PROPOSAL OF MACAULAY

EXTRACTS OF LORD MACAULAY'S ADDRESS TO THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT ON FEBRUARY 2, 1835.

"I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, (Gurukuls where Brahmcharya was taught) her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominant nation."

Exactly what I am seeing today. A language, which has no proper composition, no proper pronunciation and no proper theme has become necessary for the world. Sanskrit language, to which even computer specialists find most suitable language for computers, is being abused by our own intellectuals.  

Look! In spite of protracted attack, murder, demolition of worship places, rape of women and plunder by Muslims since 712 A. D., Aryans were spiritually, morally and economically rich. Bharat was golden bird until 1835 A. D. No sooner Aryans lost their semen and morals, they lost everything. Tell me who is more lethal; the culture of Tadka defended by Pranab Da or the culture of Putanaa represented by Antonia?

Despite mass killings of Hindus by the Muslim rulers well documented in thousands of books and documents around the world {excepting in the text-books of Mullah Arjun Singh(!)}, the fact remains that the Muslims did not succeed in eliminating the Hindus as a race altogether nor could they succeed in reducing Hindus to a minority, like Christians in America. Despite forcible conversions, India could not be Islamized. How did it happen? Alberuni has solved this riddle: “The Hindus differ from us in religion. There is very little disputing about theological topics among themselves, at the most they fight with words, but they will never stake their soul or body or their property on religious controversy. In all manners and usages, they differ from us to such a degree as to frighten their children with us”. However, Alberuni was wrong. The reason was protection of semen with the help of Gurukuls.

One who has seen vultures might have knowledge that perching of a single vulture upon a green tree is more than enough to annihilate the tree. One Columbus reached America and annihilated the entire 100 million Red Indians and their Maya culture. One Macaulay reached India and annihilated Gurukul system and Sanskrit language.

Comments of Sir Thomas Munro

Thomas Munro (1761-1827) held various posts in the colonial administration of India, served as brigadier-general during the third Maratha War (1817–18) and was nominated Governor of Madras in 1819. A distinguished Governor of Madras, in a statement made by him before a Committee of the House of Commons, on April 12 of 1813 AD, ("Hansard's Debates, April 12), he noted:

"If a good system of agriculture, unrivalled manufacturing skill, a capacity to produce whatever can contribute to convenience or luxury, schools established in every village for teaching, reading, writing and arithmetic; the general practice of hospitality and charity among each other; and above all, a treatment  of the female sex full of confidence, respect, and delicacy, (if all these) are among the signs which denote a civilized people, then the Aryans, are not inferior to the nations of Europe; and if civilization is to become an article of trade between England and India, I am convinced that England will gain by the import cargo."

The modus operandi of enslaving humanity

We Vedic Pathies do not believe. Our slogan is ‘Aham Brahmashmi’. Even Lord Buddh told, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your reason and your own common sense."

In contrast,

The radical weakness of Judaism, Christianity & Islam as moral philosophies lie in their eradication of the individual conscience of humanity in favor of unthinking submission to the mere letter of revealed law. The long cherished moral, liberty of faith, right to property, chastity and dignity of women are snatched in lieu of booty and sex. The Bible, Koran and Sunnah (example of Mohammed) stand above reason, conscience, or nature. A thing is right - including acts and laws abhorrent to "superseded" or "irrelevant" natural morality - simply because Jehovah, Jesus and Allah say so, or because the prophets have thus said or done. The lack of any pretense to a moral basis for Bible or Sharia (Islamic law) is open and explicit: there is no "spirit of the law" in Christianity and Islam, no rationality behind it for human reason to discover by exercising man's God- given intellect. There is no discernment of the consequences of deeds, and revelation and traditions must not be questioned. Nor may any other standard of good and evil - least of all any notion of "natural" justice such as that assumed by the founding documents of our Veds or Manusmriti - be invoked.

Torah, Bible and Sharia cannot be penetrated by reason (its apparent inconsistencies notwithstanding) and the very attempt is forbidden heresy. It's blasphemy and attracts death penalty in Islamic and Christian countries and punishment u/s 153 and 295 of the Indian Penal Code. Every Jew, Christian or Moslem, who is qualified to give a sound opinion on matters of Torah, Bible or Sharia, is entitled to interpret the application of Torah, Sharia or Bible when such interpretation becomes necessary, but where an explicit command of Jehovah, Jesus and Allah or Prophets already exists, no rabbi, Pope, Father, Gideon, Cleric or Mufti, Aalim, Moslem leader or legislature can form an independent judgment. Since Muhammad is the final prophet, there can be no further development in any judicial matters where the Bible, Koran and Sunnah provide guidance. This deeply undermines the possibility of rational civic debate in Moslem or Christian nations and accounts for the distinctly inhuman flavor of their legal systems.

Any one, who brings these facts before humanity, is being beaten by the police till one is conscious. There after one is being produced before judiciary. Judiciary happily sends such person to judicial custody and supposed to convict that one!

And note! While quoting the facts of Koran is crime attracting action under Indian Penal Code, the books from where these quotations are drawn remains sacred cow and immune from any action.

Jihad (Crusade) (Koran 2:193; 2:216; 8:39 etc) is the culture of Muslims. Plunder, (Koran 8:1, 8:41) murder (Koran 9:5; 33:61 etc) and rape of alien women (Koran 4:24; 23:5; 33:50; 70:30 etc) is integral part of Jihad and is unfettered fundamental right of every Muslim as provided by the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution.

So long as Muslims slay Aryans, usurp their properties, rape their women, no Muslim is arrested. No inquiry commission is constituted. Muslims murdered Kashmere Aryans and are usurping the properties of more than 3 lacs Aryans in Kashmir since 1990. Yet, no one is arrested for usurping booty.

There are yet other hard truths that the FIRs for demolition of Babri structure were registered by two Police Officers named Priyambda Nath Shukla and Om Prakash Tiwari and the Librhan Commission had been setup. However during the same period more than 108 temples were demolished by Muslims in Kashmir alone. Out of them, there are 30 FIRs not investigated in last 20 years. The Chairman and Union of India owe responsibility to clarify as to why no police officer registered any complaint for the demolition of the temples and there is no enquiry commission for the demolition of the temples? The Chairman Librhan Commission had issued NBW against Ex. CM Kalyan and the very chairman Librhan Commission had no power to summon me! Remember! The main dispute is as to why Islam and Masjid should stay in Bharat. The Chairman and the judiciary are being paid to thwart this very dispute!

Thus as long as Muslims and Christians demolish temples, Union of India and Democracy do not take action. No sooner a Church or mosque is demolished all hells break out!

Thus these criminals of Union of India would construct Ram Temple!


Comments