Revision against Charge 166-06

 

 

 

 

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ROHINI DISTT COURTS, DELHI

 (UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE)

CRIMINAL REVISION No.                                OF 2013

IN

FIR No. 166/2006 u/s 153A & 295A PS NARELA OUTER DELHI.

 

In the matter of :-

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi S/O late Shri Beni Madhav Tripathi R/o 77 Khera Khurd, Delhi-110082 …………………………………………………………………….. Petitioner

Versus

Government of NCT of Delhi, through its Secretary, Home, N.C.T. Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002. ………………………………………….. Respondent

To,

Hon’ble the ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ROHINI DISTT COURTS, DELHI,

Hon’ble Sir,

(Revision under section 482 Cr.P.C., thereby invoking the inherent jurisdiction for calling the records and setting aside the order dated 15-03-2013 passed by the Metropolition Magistrate, Rohini, Delhi of framing charges u/s 153A and 295A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and quashing of FIR 166 of 2006)

I, Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, the accused in the above case, solemnly affirm and state, as here under,

1.       That the cultures of perpetrators of Islamic Jihad and Christianity's Mission have been detained in India to kill every one. They are inflamed with violent and racist doctrines, which are, 'Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both are killer cultures according to their religious dogmas. Both have agenda and Humanity is ignorant of it. As such Christian would kill Muslim and Muslim would kill Christian. Christianity and Islam have been created to reduce human beings into slaves that would culminate in annihilation of humanity like dinosaurs. 

2.       That Muslims' Allah and his Islam have divided humanity between Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad. (Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and properties. "We, Vedic Panthies are proud to belong to Vedic Sanaatan Dharm which has taught the world both tolerance and universal acceptance. Liberty is our birth right. No one has right to snatch our liberty. We are proud to belong to a nation, which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of earth. While Aryans’ Vedic Sanaatan Dhram provided shelter to every faith, killer cultures Judaism, Christianity and Islam have annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to.

3.       That the ld. court below has been pleased to try us for committing offences u/ss 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code. The sections pertain to offences of inciting violence and communal hatred against State. I declare that I published and distributed pamphlet to protest against obscenity of Christian girl students, exercising my right of private defense as provided in section 102 of the Indian Penal Code, which is no offence as per section 96 of the Indian Penal Code. I have quoted these sections in Annexure-2 attached with this petition. Moreover, I was under house arrest by Narela Police and could not demonstrate. The Government of NCT is hell bent to get us killed and eradicate our Vedic Sanaatan Dharm.

4.       That Hon'ble Court may note that the Indian Constitution is booby trap. Its Article 29(1) has granted unfettered fundamental right to Christianity and Islam to conserve their cultures of murder, plunder, conversion and rape of women. Union of India wants that we should preserve the sanctity of the very Indian Constitution! Judiciary has taken oath to uphold the Indian Constitution and the laws of the land. It is clear, accordingly, that we should allow Christianity and Islam to slay us. One, who would exercise right of private defense u/s 102 of the Indian Penal Code would be victimized by the judges. A copy of letter from Home Ministry is being attached with this petition and is being marked as Annexure-3 for perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

5.      That judiciary is being used as tool for her own doom. This case is under trial after the sanction, on record; of the Lt Governor vides Article 159 of the Indian Constitution, under section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code. I have quoted these sections in Annexure-2 attached with this petition for perusal of this Hon'ble Court. This Hon'ble Court cannot file complaint or try any father or Imaam, who blaspheme Hon'ble Court’s deities and abuse her faith. It is evident that the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution as well as section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code’s General Strategic Plan to annihilate Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti has achieved great success within ever since the Indian Constitution is imposed.  Ultimately, the control of all knowledge of Christianity and Islam and the civilizations’ mission and jihad operation facilitates the attack against the Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti and effectively prevents any counter to expansionism of Christianity and Islam.  We are well on our way to being subdued by Christianity and Islam that has cleverly silenced us. This Hon'ble Court may forget me and invent a solution as to how is she going to defend herself?

6.      That I am exposing the corrupt and immoral practices of the Congress Party and its Italian catholic leader Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi. I express concerns against the lethal manuals named the Indian Constitution, Koran and Bible. I have been trying to inform Humanity on the corrosive, violent, and immoral effect of the Congress Party and her Indian Constitution. Humanity is ill-informed. I wish to make humanity aware of the fact that so long as Democracy, Christianity & Islam survive, humanity cannot survive. Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi is offended by the exposure of her ulterior motives. The present case is the result of her displeasure.

7.      That Christianity and Islam are cults invented to enslave humanity and have been created to reduce human beings into dinosaurs. Why should we allow such Indian Constitution survive, which has provided unfettered fundamental right to Muslims and Christians to slay us as per Article 29(1)? It is time to wake up and fight against these cults, as they are threat to humankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims and Christians. As long as Muslims and Christians believe in Muhammad and Jesus, they are a threat to others and even to themselves. Secularism and Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Judaism's, Christianity's & Islam's demand for every civilization to submit. {Azaan, (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39) and (Bible, Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5 and Luke 19:27)}. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond by ignoring the failure. (No freedom of faith). Muslims and Christians must leave their Christianity and Islam, discard their cultures of hate (Azaan that Allah is the only God and declaration that Jesus alone can grant salvation) and join the rest of humankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims and non-Christians must separate themselves from them, ban Christianity and Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and Christians and slay those, who plot against humanity and refuse to integrate. Christianity and Islam are incompatible with humanity and morality. These are warring creeds {(Koran 2:216 and 8:65) and (Bible, Matt 10:34 and Luke 12:49)} that use democracy to destroy humanity and to establish itself as a worldwide dictatorship. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacies of Christianity and Islam and demystify them. Muslims and Christians must be weaned from Christianity and Islam for humanity to survive and live in peace. (Bible, Luke 19:27) and (Koran 8:39).

8.      That the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi has accused me of attempts to promote, on grounds of religion disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commit act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, u/s 153A and attempt of deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of Christians and Muslims (u/s 295A). Is this Hon'ble Court sure? Do we broadcast from the pulpits of our temples that Ishwar alone can be worshipped? Have we ever called for jihad against ardent Christians and Muslims? Have we said anywhere that Muslims should recant their faith, pay jizyah, or they should be killed? Does my Ishwar commands us to slay those, (Bible, Luke 19:27), who do not accept Ishwar their king? Where is this disturbing religious harmony, incitation and outraging of religious feelings judiciary tried about against me since 1993 A.D.?  Judiciary fails to see that Imaams are broadcasting from mosques Azaan, Jesus imposed his kingdom around the world and adamant to impose Armageddon and Muhammad imposed his diabolic faith on others through his numerous ghazwas (raids). Their mission and Jihad is flourishing leap and bounce. Our ancestors were massacred, women raped and forced into conversion, but judiciary see my attempt of private defense u/s 102 of the Indian Penal Code as an incitation? Can Christians and Muslims, who do not want to remain Christians and Muslims, click out of their faith? What will happen to them if they do so? May peruse (Koran 5;101 & 102) and (Bible, Deuteronomy 13:6-11). Is it the freedom of faith stipulated in the Article 25 of the Indian Constitution? Can prosecution prosecute either an Imaam or a father and can this Hon'ble Court try an Imaam or a father for blasphemy and preaching to slay non Christians and Kafirs? Is this Hon'ble Court free to do justice? That the relevant sections have been elaborated by me in Annexure-A2. Can non-Muslims living in Islamic countries practice their faith freely? Have judges read about the recent violence against the Copts in Egypt? Have judges heard of innocent Muslims in Pakistan accused of blasphemy and lynched by Muslim goons? 

9.      That our ancestors were butchered and raped by evangelists and marauding Muslims, and now judiciary is defending the barbaric faith of her abusers for the sake of her sustenance, power and pelf? Judges’ ancestors, like mine, were butchered, raped and forced into conversion by Jesuits and Jihadis. Judges, now, are hired for defending the very barbaric faiths of their abusers? The sorry state of affair is that public servants, including judges, do not feel horrified that they have been reduced to sheep of such a blatant criminal cow and man eater Jesus and Zimmi of Allah. I feel pity for the Public servants and judges, who are hired criminals of Democracy. The Indian Constitution converts them into criminals. The rulers of the world need dominance and booty. For the very purpose, the so called prophets, who were otherwise scoundrels, fabricated criminal gods and established themselves intermediaries to their gods. The books named Bible and Koran of these gods have been compiled to justify the most ungodly behavior the world has ever known. Qaba and Vetican are booty. Azaan is blasphemy of the faiths and deities of non Muslims. Azaan incites communal hatred and strife on the basis of religion. Azaan is offence and attracts action under section 153/295 of the Indian Penal Code. The Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution and section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code has condoned Muslim Imaams from action u/s 153 or 295 of the Indian Penal Code. It was the Calcutta High Court, which held (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1985 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182) that no court can sit into the judgment against the guides of criminals named Koran and Bible, In lieu of abusing judges’ faith and Ishwar, through Azaan, the apex court has issued writ to pay salaries to Imaams amounting to Rs. 10,000 crores annually. (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086). It was the apex court, which supported Hajj subsidy. http://indiankanoon.org/doc/709044/ . It was the apex court, which snatched right of maintenance of Muslim women in Shah Bano case; but could not stop 3 talak. It was apex court, which tried Sati case of Roop Kunwar in Rajasthan but failed to stop Burqa. Now it is judiciary, which legalized homosexuality. Apex court refused to intervene. It is the apex court, which legalized live in relationship. It is the Haryana High Court which permitted marriage between same Gotra. Apex court refused to intervene. Now would be turn of Virgin mothers. Judiciary would rule that virgin mothers be rewarded by the Governments. Article 25(2) of the 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights' has already done it. The Article stipulates, "Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection." They (Christians and Muslims) have divine sanction to marry their daughters (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36) and daughter in laws. (Koran 33:37-38). They (Christians and Muslims) have extended the facilities to judges as well.

10.  That Judges and we do not owe any allegiance to the demonic faith of the murderers of our ancestors. Judges fail to see that Jesuits and Jihadis imposed their kingdom, in the name of Jesus and Allah, on others through their conversions, inquisitions and Jihads. Their mission and Jihad are in progress. Do judges not get horrified that they have no forum to complain against Christianity and Islam as per section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code? Wake up Public Servants as well as Judges. Don't betray your own people, your own ancestors, your own ancient Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. Do not become the defender of a cult that destroyed you, your moral, and your Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti? Instead of defending the filthy cult of a monster, you should defend your own Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti. You are Aryans. Your ancestors ruled around the world. Now, you are slaves of criminal cultures. Be proud of your heritage that has contributed to humanity so much.  

11.  That secular Allah's good Muslim becomes Jihadist i.e. crusader of Islam, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah’s Cause. (Koran, 8:72). That cause is destroying all faiths save Islam. (Koran 8:39). Allah says they (Muslims) will be rewarded with stolen booty (Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41) and women to rape (Koran, 23:6) of the victim/s, if they survive or with a heavenly BROTHEL (Koran, 37:47-49 and 76:19-21) if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them “hypocrites”, because they are unwilling to fight. (Koran, 3:167). He even says that peaceful Muslims are “the vilest of creatures” and that hell’s hottest fires await them. [Koran 16:70] If you are a peace-loving Muslim, may note, your Allah hates you. Muslims have no shame that they submit to dreaded incest monger, (Koran 33:37-38) assassin and robber Allah. (Koran, 8:1 and 17). Good Muslims are those, who relinquished liberty in lieu of booty and sex. Look! This is secularism. Democrats say, "This is peaceful coexistence and religious tolerance!"

Prayer

12.  It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that I have not committed any crime. Instead, I have exercised my right to private defense, as stipulated in section 102 of the Indian Penal Code, Any act done in private defense in no crime as per section 96 of the Indian Penal Code. However, this Hon’ble Court has no option. She has to put her own life and property in jeopardy for her sustenance, power and pelf. Imams and fathers are free to abuse and insult the P.O. of this Hon’ble Court. Still this Hon’ble Court cannot register FIR against Imams due to immunity granted under section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, if the P.O. of this Hon’ble Court wishes to survive, she may set aside the charge framed on 16-03-2013 by the Ld. Court below and scrap the FIR 166/2006 registered at Narela Police Station.

(Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi)

(ACCUSED IN PERSON)

VERIFICATION

Verified this day of April 28, 2013, that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 12 of the above revision, are true on the basis of record and law. No part of this revision is false and nothing material has been concealed. So help me god.

 

(Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi)

(ACCUSED IN PERSON)

Dated; Wednesday, May 08, 2013


Annexure-2

The reader may read the article below on our Website,

http://www.aryavrt.com/azaaneng

Why allow Azaan?

Christianity and Islam have been fabricated to enslave else kill a human being.

Rulers, Judges, Governors, Leaders, reformers, saints, Media, Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving humanity. The truth is not hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. Good Muslims and Christians would continue to wage Jihad and Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivation is Koran and Bible. (Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). If we don’t retaliate, they would keep on killing Humanity. Non-violence is imposed upon Aryans only through [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and Sections 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Secular Allah's good Muslim becomes Jihadist i.e. crusader of Islam, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah’s Cause. (Koran, 8:72). That cause is destroying all faiths save Islam. (Koran 8:39). Allah says they (Muslims) will be rewarded with stolen booty (Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41) and women to rape (Koran, 23:6) of the victims, if they survive or with a heavenly BROTHEL (Koran, 37:47-49 and 76:19-21) if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them “hypocrites”, because they are unwilling to fight. (Koran, 3:167). He even says that peaceful Muslims are “the vilest of creatures” and that hell’s hottest fires await them. [Koran 16:70] If you are a peace-loving Muslim, may note, your Allah hates you. Muslims have no shame that they submit to dreaded incest monger, (Koran 33:37-38) assassin and robber Allah. (Koran, 8:1 and 17). Good Muslims are those, who relinquished liberty in lieu of booty and sex. Look! This is secularism. Democrats say, "This is peaceful coexistence and religious tolerance!"

Let us examine, what (Imaams) literally broadcast from their mosques,

Allahu Akbar Allah is the greatest

Allahu Akbar Allah is the greatest

Ash hadu an la ilaha illal lah I bear witness that there is no deity but Allah.

Ash hadu an la ilaha illal Lah I bear witness that there is no deity but Allah.

Ash hadu an-na Muhammadar rasulul lah I bear witness that Muhammad(saw) is the messenger of Allah.

Ash hadu Anna Muhammadar rasulul lah I bear witness that Muhammad(saw) is the messenger of Allah.

Hayya 'alas salah Come to payer

Hayya 'alas salah Come to Prayer.

Hayya 'alal falah Come to your Good

liayya 'alal falah Come to your Good.

Allahu Akbar Allah is the greatest

Allahu Akbar Allah is the greatest

La ilaha illal Lah There is no deity but Allah.

Now sooth sayers may explain,

If 'There is no deity but Allah.' My Ishwar is false. I have no right to pray my Ishwar. I would be killed by Allah (Koran 8:17). As such where is my freedom of faith guaranteed by the Indian Constitution and 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights' of UNO?

 Allah, through his Koran commands, 'Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39). Reading Allah’s orders out of the Koran’s 8th surah, from the pulpits of their mosques Imaams preach: “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will kill a thousand Infidels, for they are a people devoid of understanding.” That is the math of terror. It is being made possible because infidels are ignorant of Islam. In addition, note how, the Koran defines “Infidels”. “They are surely Infidels who say Christ, the Messiah is God.” (5:72). This Islam means peace!

Read how Allah recruits suicide bombers: “Those who barter their life in this world for the next should fight in the way of Allah; whether he is killed or victorious, a glorious reward awaits.” “Urge the believers to fight…to keep back the might of the Infidels.” “Seize them and kill them wherever they are.” “Muslims who sit idle are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s Cause with their wealth and lives. Allah has exalted  those, who fight for Islam.” That is taqiyya of peaceful coexistence!

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm

http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php#002.191

The official English Koran bears the stamp of the Fahd Foundation. It writes below surah 2:190, “Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad, Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad, Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.”

There is nothing peaceful about Islam. Islam’s dogma breeds ruthless killers. At her direction, Muslims will continue to terrorize the world until non-Muslims (Kafirs) are no more.

Koran 61:4 “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His Cause.” Ishaq:300 “I am fighting in Allah’s service. This is piety and a good deed. In Allah’s war I do not fear as others should. For this fighting is righteous, true, and good.”

“When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle (fighting Jihad in Allah’s Cause), smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making (them) captives. Thereafter either generosity or ransom (them based upon what benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens. Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam.” Koran 47:4

It is not up to me, but to Muslims and Christians themselves to tear out the hateful verses from their Koran and Bible.

Muslims and Christians want that you respect Christianity and Islam; but Christianity and Islam do not respect you.

Government and the so called independent judiciary insist that you respect Christianity/ Islam, but Christianity/ Islam has to slay you.

Christianity and Islam want to rule the world, dominate and seek annihilation of Vedic Sanaatan Dharm.

I am quoting Fallaci, a renowned journalist from her book, "In 1974 [Algerian President] Boumedienne, the man who ousted Ben Bella three years after Algerian independence(?), spoke before the General Assembly of the UN. And without circumlocutions he said: ‘One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst into the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with their children. Victory will come to us from the wombs of our [(looted and raped) (Koran 23:6)] women.’ "

The Islamic prime Minister of Turkey Erdogan clearly and loudly said “The Mosques are (not worship places) our barracks, the Domes are helmets, the Minarets are Bayonets and the faithful are soldiers.” Erdogan’s vision of Islam is the same as that of Bin-Laden, Colonel Khadafy, Mullah Omar, Imam Yavalaki, Al-Zwahiri, Ayatollah Khomeini and the Saudi King who awarded the Islamic Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan “The King Faisal International prize for service to Islam.”

Read the words of the Saudi ruling family’s favorite Imaam, al Buraik. He is licensed Imaam, He’s atop the social hierarchy. Prior to a telethon hosted to enrich the families of Palestinian suicide bombers, this esteemed cleric said, “I am against America. She is the root of all evils and wickedness on earth. Muslims, don’t take Jews and Christians as allies. Muslim brothers in Palestine, do not have any mercy or compassion on them, their blood, their money, or their flesh. Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them yours. Why don’t you enslave their women? Why don’t you wage jihad? Why don’t you pillage (plunder) them?”

Do you suppose the licensed Saudi cleric was corrupting Islam too? Sorry. It’s Allah who commands Muslims not to befriend Christians and Jews, for he wants them killed so he can use their bodies to stoke hell’s fires. “O believers, do not hold Jews and Christians as your allies. They are allies of one another; and anyone who makes them his friends is one of them.” Koran 5:51. “As for those who deny Islam...they shall be the faggots for the Fire of Hell.” Koran 2:10. “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’” Koran 8:67. Therefore, Saudi Imaam has correctly interpreted Islam’s message. “Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.” Koran 33:26

Does the reader know? The Islamic warlords, who rule Saudi Arabia were enthroned by the British, by way of reward. The Britons bribed them to fight against their Muslim brethren, the Ottoman Turks, in the World War I.

Pakistani radical Muslim theorist Syed Abul Ala Maududi declared that "Islam requires the earth - not just a portion, but the whole planet - not because the sovereignty over the earth should be wrested from one Nation or several Nations and vested in one particular Nation, but because the entire mankind should benefit ... from 'Islam' which is the programme of well-being for all humanity.

Maududi insisted that Kafirs, although free to practice their “false, man-made way,” have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.”

The reader may forget me and think as to how would the reader protect his/her own dignity, life and property?

http://www.aryavrt.com/Home/aseemananda/yes-we-are-bombing-mosques

That to proselytize is grievous sin and attracts death penalty in Christianity and Islam both. Below are the extracts from Bible and Koran.

http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com/2009/12/conversion-christianity-and-islam.html

Conversion, Christianity and Islam

That for the facts extracted below, would Sonia, the super PM of India, for the commands of Jehovah, let me know as to why missionaries of India, engaged in conversion, are not killed?

(Bible, Deuteronomy 13:6-11)

6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;

7 [Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth;

8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:

9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.

10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.

11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.”

May Hamid Ansari, the Vice-President let me as to why should we not seize Muslims and kill them wherever we find them?

Extracted from Koran,

Koran 4:89 “They wish that you would reject Faith, as they have, and thus be on the same footing: Do not be friends with them until they leave their homes in Allah’s Cause. But [and this is a hell of a but...] if they turn back from Islam, becoming renegades/apostates, seize them and kill them wherever you find them.”

Prior to 3263 years there was no Jew. Earlier than 2012 AD, there was no Christian and earlier than 1433 AD, there was no Muslim. They were converted under persecution in spite of the commands of their scripture to slay the proselyte Christians and Muslims. (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) and (Koran 4:89). Why should Hindus not kill the Christians and Muslims?

Our ancestors failed us. They did not utilize the dogmas of our enemies and slay Christians and Muslims. We seek your support to slay these people for relinquishing their faiths as per their own dogmas?

Says Tulsi’s Ram Charit Manas,

अनुज बधू भगिनी सुत नारी| सुनु सठ कन्या सम ए चारी|

इन्हहिं कुदृष्टि बिलोकइ जोई| ताहि बधें कछु पाप न होई||”

राम चरित मानस, किष्किन्धाकाण्ड; ;

That Islam permits Muslims to marry daughter in law (Koran 33:37-38) and rape any non-Muslim woman (Koran 23:6). Jesus supports marriage of a Christian with one’s own daughter. (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36). Our scriptures allow slaughter for incest. As such we Vedic Panthies have religious right to kill every Christian and Muslim.

The perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed with violent and racist doctrines, which are, 'Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both have agenda, and Hindus are ignorant of it. They have been created to reduce human beings into dinosaurs. Why should we allow such Indian Constitution survive, which has provided unfettered fundamental right to Muslims and Christians to slay us as per Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution.

Christianity and Islam are cults invented to enslave humanity. It is time to wake up and fight against these cults, as they are threat to humankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims and Christians. As long as Muslims and Christians believe in Muhammad and Jesus, they are a threat to others and even to themselves. It is time to wake up and fight against these cults, as they are threat to humankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims and Christians.

The LG, Government of NCT at Delhi, fails to apprehend the danger of survival of Vedic Sanaatan  Dharm and India posed by criminal cultures of Christianity and Islam. However, she was quick to apprehend the incitement of communal hatred in my pamphlet ‘KIRAYA KANOON’

That Muslims have constructed mosque in Subhash Park, opposite Red Fort, Delhi on the plea that there was Masjid Aqbrabadi before 1857 A.D. Delhi High Court has asked for inquiry with ASI. Well, there is already a board from ASI, in the vicinity of Qutub Minar (Vishnu Dhwaj), Mehrauli, Delhi, stating that the Masjid was constructed from the debris of 27 temples. I demand that the Masjid be replaced with our 27 temples. Nay! Even the Qaba of Muslims is our Jyotirling. I have filed a petition in the court of International justice the details can be had on the URL below,

http://aaryavrt.blogspot.in/2007/08/repatriation-of-qaba.html

Pray! Write me, where is peaceful co-existence, tolerance, Secularism and Multiculturalism in Islam?

http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com/2007/04/judgment-of-pci.html

http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com/2007/04/judgment-on-azaan.html

That Judiciary is guided by the Indian Constitution. Its compiler wanted to burn it. Below is the evidence,

From Rajya Sabha debates; September 2, 1953

"Now, Sir," the member said, "we have inherited a tradition. People always keep saying to me: 'Oh, you are the maker of the Constitution.' "My answer is - I was a hack. What I was asked to do, I did much against my will.

“He ridiculed the "notions of democracy" the country had acquired because of its hatred of the British, like the notion that to leave any discretionary powers with the Governor is undemocratic. "We have inherited the idea that the Governor must have no power at all, that he must be a rubber-stamp," the member explained. "If a minister, however scoundrelly he may be, if he puts up a proposal before the Governor, he has to ditto it. That is the kind of conception about democracy, which we have developed in this country," he continued.

"But you defended it," interjected a member from Rajasthan.

"We lawyers defend many things....," said the member. Several members were on their feet protesting.

He proceeded to ask the Home Minister : “were our Constitution to give discretionary powers to Governors on the lines of the Canadian Constitution, how would it become undemocratic?” The Home Minister said his answer was that the member had been responsible for drafting the Constitution. The member shot back, "You want to accuse me of your blemishes?"

He returned to the point a little later in his speech : "Sir," he said, "my friends tell me that I have made the Constitution. But I am quite prepared to say that I shall be the first person to burn it out. I do not want it. It does not suit anybody...." (Except Sonia).

The member ? B.R. Ambedkar, of course!, who compiled the Indian Constitution.

Now time has come, when you yourself have to decide to believe this judiciary, media, and government to commit suicide or raise your voice against Christianity and Islam?????

 

"IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT, AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION."

This is fraud. Those, who compiled the Constitution, were not elected by the people of Bharat after transfer of power by Jesus. No referendum or plebiscite was ever arranged to obtain the consent of the people about body of the Indian Constitution. Then how the people of Bharat enacted, adopted and given to themselves this code of usurpers, murderers, rapists, secession mongers etc.?

URL: http://www.constitution.org/cons/india/p03029.html

PART III

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

“Cultural and Educational Rights

‘’29. Protection of Interests of Minorities-(1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territories of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script, or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.’’

DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –

“(c) That the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;"

Whoever would become President or Governor, s/he would take oath to preserve, protect and defend the very predator and pirate Indian Constitution, which has been compiled to conserve the so called dreaded cultures of the so-called minority Christian and Muslim, who are the largest and the second largest population of the world.

Section 196 of the CrPC

196. Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence.

(1) No court shall take cognizance of-

(a) Any offence punishable under Chapter VI or under section 153A, 1[section 295A or sub-section (1) of section 505] of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or
punishable under sections 153/295 of the Indian Penal Code

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, or

(c) Any such abetment, as is described in section 108A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), except with the previous sanction of the central Government or of the State Government.

Nay! Even police and public have to silently bear the scourge of Christianity and Islam, who are slaves and have been detained in India to enslave one and all and eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. I am a victim of the very black law.

A close study of the Indian Constitution makes it clear that Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution has been compiled to slay Hindus. I have elaborated it in the coming lines. Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution has been compiled to snatch the properties and capital of citizens. Articles 60 and 159 have been compiled to preserve, protect and defend the rights of Christians and Muslims by President of India and Governors. This Indian Constitution was enforced on January 26, 1950. Since then till to date no one challenged the above Articles. As such even Tata and Ambanis would lose their empire within seconds.

Suggestion to Muslims

Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution has bound public servants to preserve, protect and defend Christianity and Islam. For sustenance, power and pelf a public servant, legislature and PM has to depose faith and allegiance in the dreaded predator and pirate Indian Constitution as per Schedule III in various forms. A high court and apex court judge has to take oath to uphold the Indian Constitution as per Schedule III forms IV and VIII. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the Indian Constitution as per Article 60 and Governors take oath to preserve, protect and defend the Indian Constitution as per Article 159. Governors and Judges, who administer oath to each other, have no choice. Either one has to leave one’s dignity, right of life and property and freedom else one’s sustenance.

No voter can change Articles 29(1) and 39(c) and no voter can claim restoration of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Thus, one votes to decide as to who would plunder one? Whether Atal or Mulayam or Rahul or Antonia Maino? One accepts through electoral process that every Muslim and Christian shall retain right to convert, rape women of alien faith, plunder and murder aliens. Still the Christians and Muslims would remain nationalist, merciful, and secular! Socialism of Carl Marx has already gone to hell. Now is the turn of Christianity and Islam.

It is relevant to mention that Sonia and her nominated Hamid are deputed to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm and slay humanity and I am engaged in preserving, protecting and defending our Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. It is the LG, NCT of Delhi, who is committing offence of preserving, protecting and defending Christianity and Islam.

In the instance case the public servants themselves are protecting and defending our as well as their own killer Christians and Muslims, as such the sections 99 and 153A are not applicable against me. Because there is no question of asking for protection u/s 99 of the Indian Penal Code, when the public servants themselves are defending our killers for their sustenance, power, pelf and financial status?

The Indian Constitution was implemented on January 26, 1950. Till to date no one protested against Articles 29(1), 39(c), 60 and 159 and no one protested against section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Accordingly everyone from top to bottom has voluntarily delivered one’s women, land and property to Christians and Muslims and relinquished one’s culture. However, the rights of Muslims are in share with Christians. I suggest Muslims to grab authority by wresting the monopoly from Christian Sonia. Rest assured that right from me until Pranab Da would happily make queue to deliver Muslims whatever we have, including our girls. We have no option.

1.      That I have been accused for committing crime u/s 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code, which I never committed, instead I have exercised my right of private defense u/ss 97, 99, 102 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code. This Hon’ble Court has no choice than to act upon the sanction of the LG u/s 196 of the CrPC. I am reproducing the sections 153A and 295A,

1[153A. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.—(1) whoever—

“(a) By words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or” 

“(b) Commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility,…

"Shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.”

295A-

Central Government Act

Section 295A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860

295A. 5[ Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.-- Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of 6[ citizens of India], 7[ by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise] insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 8[ three years], or with fine, or with both.]

 

May I know what are Azaan and Khutbas preached from mosques?

2.      That I am reproducing other sections 96, 97, 99 and 102 of the Indian Penal Code below,

Section 96. Things done in private defense

Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed, “(iii) where the right of private defense is pleaded, the defense must be a reasonable and probable version satisfying the cast that the harm caused by the accused was necessary for either warding off the attack or for forestalling the further reasonable apprehension from the side of the accused. The burden of establishing the plea of self-defense is on the accused and the burden stands discharged by showing preponderance of probabilities in favour of that plea on the basis of the material on record; Rizan v. State of Chattisgarh, AIR 2003 SC 976.

http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/29943/

Christians and Muslims are fighting with full determination to annihilate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm under the sponsorship of the dreaded predator and pirate Indian Constitution, which is a booby trap. [As per Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution, oaths of President Pranab, Governors, (Articles 60 and 159 of the Indian Constitution), Judiciary, National Human Rights Commission and law makers (MLAs, MPs etc).]

Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Section 97. Right of private defense of the body and of property

Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend—

 First.— His own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body;

 Secondly.—The property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, rob­bery, mischief or criminal trespass.

Section 99. Act against which there is no right of private defense

There is no right of private defense against an act which does not reasonable cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law.

There is no right of private defense against an act which does not reasonable cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law.

There is no right of private defense in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.

Section 102. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defense of the body,

The right of private defense of the body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises from an attempt or threat to commit the offence though the offence may not have been committed; and it continues as long as such apprehension of danger to the body continues.

Section 105. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defense of property

The Right of private defense of property commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences.

The right of private defense of property against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the property has been recovered.

60. Oath or affirmation by the President.—Every President and every person acting as President or discharging the functions of the President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe in the presence of the Chief Justice of India or, in his absence, the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court available, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say—

   

 "I, A.B., do swear in the name of God /  solemnly  affirm that  I  will faithfully execute the office of President (or discharge the functions of  the President) of India and will to the best of my ability preserve,  protect  and  defend  the Constitution  and  the  law  and  that  I  will  devote  myself  to  the  service  and  well-being of  the  people  of   India.".

 

159. Oath or affirmation by the Governor.—Every Governor and every person discharging the functions of the Governor shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe in the presence of the Chief Justice of the High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the State, or, in his absence, the senior most Judge of that Court available, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say—

“I, A. B., do swear in the name of God/ solemnly affirm that I will  faithfully execute the office of Governor (or discharge the functions of the Governor) of .............(name of the State) and  will  to  the  best  of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the law and that I will devote myself to the service and well-being of the people of ..………(name of the State) .”

[THIRD SCHEDULE OF THE Indian Constitution, Form IV and VIII read with Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution]

[Articles 75(4), 99, 124(6), 148(2), 164(3), 188 and 219]*

Forms of Oaths or Affirmations

IV

Form of oath or affirmation to be made by the Judges of the Supreme Court and the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India:

“I, A.B., having been appointed (nominated) Chief Justice (or a Judge) of the Supreme Court of India (or Comptroller and Auditor-General of India) do swear in the name of God/ solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws.”

VIII

Form of oath or affirmation to be made by the Judges of a High Court:

“I, A.B., having been appointed (nominated) Chief Justice (or a Judge) of the High Court at (or of) ..........do swear in the name of God/ solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws.”

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi (Press Secretary)

Aryavrt Government,

77 Khera Khurd, Delhi -110082.

Ph: (+91)9152579041


IN THE COURT OF ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ROHINI DISTT COURTS, DELHI

CRIMINAL REVISION No.                               OF 2013

FIR No. 166/2006 u/s 153A & 295A PS NARELA OUTER DELHI.

IN RE:-

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi...............       Petitioner

VERSUS

State of NCT Delhi ……..  Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi S/O late Shri Beni Madhav Tripathi, R/O 77 Khera Khurd, Delhi-110082, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

1. That I am petitioner in the above Revision Petition as such I am fully conversant with the facts of the case and competent to depose the facts of the case.

2. That I have not filed any revision/appeal against the impugned orders dated 16-03-2013 either in this Hon'ble Court or before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi earlier.

3. That I state that the contents of the accompanying Revision Petition are true and correct to my knowledge.

Deponent

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi

VERIFICATION:

Verified at Delhi on this April 28, 2013 that the contents of the above affidavit are true to the best of knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed. So help me God.

Deponent

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi

Oath Commissioner.

 

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ROHINI DISTT COURTS, DELHI

CRIMINAL REVISION No.                               OF 2013

FIR No. 166/2006 u/s 153A & 295A PS NARELA OUTER DELHI.

IN RE:-

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi...............       Petitioner

VERSUS

State of NCT Delhi ……..  Respondents

Application for stay of proceedings in the lower court.

Hon'ble sir,

The petitioner most respectfully showeth:-

1. That the petitioner has filed the above Revision Petition against the orders dated 16-03-2013 passed by Ld. MM Sri Sandeep Gupta.

2. That if the proceedings in the lower court are not stayed, the revision petition shall become in fructuous and the petitioner would be harassed unnecessarily.

PRAYER

In view of the submissions, it is most respectfully prayed that the proceedings before the lower court may kindly be stayed till the final decision of the revision petition.

Prayed Accordingly.

(Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi)

Petitioner in Person

Dated: Thursday, May 09, 2013.

 

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ROHINI DISTT COURTS, DELHI

CRIMINAL REVISION No.                               OF 2013

FIR No. 166/2006 u/s 153A & 295A PS NARELA OUTER DELHI.

IN RE:-

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi...............       Petitioner

VERSUS

State of NCT Delhi ……..  Respondents

List of Documents in support of Revision.

1.    Certified copy of order dated 16-03-2013

2. Extracts of the Constitution and Laws

3. Copy of Reply from UOI, in protest against Azaan.

 

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi

Petitioner in Person.

Dated: Thursday, May 09, 2013


Ċ
AyodhyaP Tripathi,
May 11, 2013, 9:28 AM
Ċ
AyodhyaP Tripathi,
May 11, 2013, 9:26 AM
ĉ
AyodhyaP Tripathi,
May 11, 2013, 9:24 AM
Comments