Indian Judiciary

Humanity failed to understand that Judiciary has nothing to do with justice. 'Justice' is the first casualty in judiciary. By default Judiciary has to uphold the Indian Constitution and Law. [THIRD SCHEDULE OF THE Indian Constitution, Form IV and VIII read with Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution]. How can Judiciary deviate from her own oath? Judiciary is house of organized financial racketeers, pettifoggers, frauds, usurpers and cheats. A man of character cannot stay in judiciary. The judiciary is being abused by judges since its inception. The puppet Judiciary has always been instrumental in stealing the possessions of the subjects and eradication of Vedic culture. One, who takes oath of faith and allegiance in the Indian Constitution, is one’s own enemy. Judiciary is puppet. Judiciary has to obey the President and Governors. (See section 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Judges function on the mercy of the prosecution. The apex court revealed her deadly fang no sooner she justified the first amendment in the Article 31 of the Indian Constitution by the house of robbers named Parliament (Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v UOI, AIR 1951 SC 458: 1052 SCR 89;) (Hiralal J. Kania CJ and 4 other JJs. Date decided 5-10-1951) pertaining to the fundamental right to property, again when her subordinate Calcutta High Court held (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1985 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182) that no court can sit into the judgment against the guides of criminals named Koran and Bible, and when apex court awarded salaries to Imaams. (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086). It was the apex court, which snatched right of maintenance of Muslim women in Shah Bano case. It was apex court, which tried Sati case of Roop Kunwar in Rajasthan. Now it is judiciary, which legalized homosexuality. Apex court refused to intervene. It is the apex court, which legalized live in relationship. It is the Haryana High Court which permitted marriage between same Gotra. Apex court refused to intervene. Now would be turn of Virgin mothers. Judiciary would rule that virgin mothers be rewarded by the Governments. Article 25(2) of the 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights' has already done it. They (Christians and Muslims) have divine sanction to marry their daughters (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36) and daughter in laws. (Koran 33:37-38). They (Christians and Muslims) are extending the facilities to you as well.

Comments