Immunity to Sonia

Immunity to Sonia

Note! With the compilation of the dreaded predator Indian Constitution, by the Britons' Congress party the citizens of India, people, including Christians and Muslims, have lost their right of life {(Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27)} and liberty of faith vides Article 29(1) and right upon their properties vides Article 39(c) since November 26, 1949. No worship place and culture can survive. [ (Bible Deut. 12:1-3) and (Koran, Bani Israel, 17:81)]. The property right, provided to the citizens vides Article 31 of the Indian Constitution, which could not be snatched even by Britons and constitution committee, was snatched through the first amendment of the Indian Constitution, by the dreaded parliament in collusion with corrupt extortionist judiciary, whose proceedings start with the extortion of Rs. ten towards 'Bhent'. (Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v UOI, AIR 1951 SC 458: 1052 SCR 89;) (Hiralal J. Kania CJ and 4 other JJs. Date decided 5-10-1951). The chastity, honour and dignity of no woman is safe. (Bible, Isaiah 13:15 and 16) (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 and 70:30).

No court can sit into judgment against Bible and Koran. (AIR 1985 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, 104). Apex court issued writ that notwithstanding Article 27 of the Indian Constitution every Imaam would get salary to abuse Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086).

Who has courage to tell all the above rubbish?

 Even election is not for the rescue of citizens, because no voter can change either Article 29(1) or 39(c) or claim restoration of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Thus, one votes to decide as to who would plunder the subjects, whether Atal or Mulayam or Rahul or Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi or Mayavati? Citizens vote to agree as to under whose regimen one's properties would be usurped, one's women would be raped and one would be slain!

Punishment to corrupts?

Below is the Article of the Indian Constitution. Can any one punish the Indian Constitution?

"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –

(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;"

This Article has to be defended by President Pratibha and State Governors and upheld by the Judges [(Articles 60 and 159 of the Indian Constitution) as well as to be upheld by the judges. (The Indian Constitution as per Schedule III forms IV and VIII)]. Public servants are supposed to deprive citizens from their belongings u/s 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Poor Rattan Tata, Ambanies and Dawood, who are looting the people, would be looted by Sonia u/a 39(c).

Nay! Below is the Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code,

197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.

 (1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction-

(a) In the case of it person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the Union, of the Central Government;

(b) In the case of a person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of a State, of the State Government:

No one has right to sue even.

 

ĉ
ap tripathi,
May 27, 2011, 5:20 AM
Comments