AHC rg 12806Y

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION –APPELLATE

Application

in

CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 1973 OF 2012 U/S 482 CrPC.

DISTT; GORAKHPUR.

APPLICATION NO.                      OF 2012

IN THE MATTER OF;

VEER BAHADUR TIWARI  ………………….. APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER …………… OPPOSITE PARTIES.

PRAYER FOR CLUBBING TOGETHER CMWP 9672/1988 Writ ‘C' WITH THIS CASE

To,

The Registrar General,

Allahabad High Court at Allahabad

Subject: Forged registration of my land Khesra 467m area 210 sqm situated in vill Lachhipur, Tahsil Sadar, Gorakhpur

And

Interpolation of revenue records of village Turkmanpur, twice as per CMWP 9672/1988 Writ ‘C', Allahabad High Court 1st in Khesra No 886 (old) and then in Khesra No. 927.

Ref: Letter no. L.15012/10/2011-Jus GOI, Ministry of Law & Justice, Department of Justice and no action taken against public servants on report/order dated July 28, 1989 in CMWP 9672/1988 Writ ‘C' of Allahabad High Court at Allahabad.

And

Denial of RTI by District Judge Gorakhpur

Hon’ble Sir,

I am a victim of judicial terror and corruption under compulsion of Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution. Order was passed by Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in above application u/s 482 CrPC. While no action has been taken in my above CMWP 9672/1988 Writ ‘C' since 1989, this Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has been pleased to admit the above referred case.

Would your esteemed office let me know as to what action is in process in my above cases?

Brief history


            I.        That the mutation of the applicant (Bir Bahadur Tiwari) was cancelled by the Naib Tahsildar. Instead of submitting his evidences the applicant preferred revision/appeal in SDM court, which was dismissed and thereafter the applicant preferred revision in Commissioner Court, which is decided ex-party in my favor. An application for restoration is pending for more than five years and no commissioner dares to accept or reject the restoration application. I am unable to pursue the case as the men of the applicant are after my life. Now, the applicant has moved Allahabad High Court on the excuse vide paras 5 and 17 of the plaint that I never got mutated the land in dispute. The fact is that I got mutated the land in dispute long back and my name is intact in revenue records. In fact the mutation of the applicant was rejected by the Naib Tahasildar. Certified copies of Khatauni is being attached with this application and is marked as (Annexure-W1 & W2).

           II.        That the applicant used to give threat to my counsels that he is working for Sonia Gandhi, the Congress chief and ruler of Rom Rajya of India and no one can dispossess him from the land in dispute. My two counsels have refused to pursue this case. It appears that the applicant is scapegoat. Sonia wants to kill the entire humanity as well as the applicant including you the Hon’ble RG. This is because either one does not worship Allah alone (Azaan and Koran 2:191) or does not accept Jesus one’s king (Bible, Luke 19:27), (India is so called Democratic Republic)read with Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution, with the extorted connivance of judiciary (AIR 1985, Calcutta High Court, Page 104). Even the apex court has issued writ in 1993 to pay salaries to Imams(Muazzins), who abuse non-Muslims at least 15 times daily. (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086) and preach slaughter of non-Muslims (KAFIRS).

         III.        That I had watched a comedy and I wish to share with Hon’ble RG. The episode was that a washer man filed a suit in the court against a man for aborting his wife. The judge passed an order that the man would keep washer man’s wife, get her pregnant and return to the washer man. That exactly is judiciary doing with me.

        IV.        That this State case is 13 years old. Since 2000 the judiciary could not serve charge-sheet to the accused. In the mean time, the young accused died in dubious circumstances. In contrast Rahul Gandhi’s case was decided in record 6 days. Sukanya became Kirti and her mother Sumitra became Sushila. A fine of Rs. 50 lacs was slapped against the complainant. (ANNEXURE-W3).

          V.        That I mailed for RTI for delay in case. It was denied. A copy of the reply is being attached with this application and is marked as (Annexure-W4).

        VI.        That I mailed several petition to Rashtrapati Bhawan. To my knowledge one of them, referred above was forwarded to Your Honour. A copy of the letter is being attached with this application and is marked as (Annexure-W5). No action has been taken by Your Honour yet.

       VII.        That there is another pending case Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 9672 of 1988 in this Allahabad High Court. I am submitting 2 orders, on record, passed by this Honour High Court bearing (Annexure-W6 to W7). Interpolations in revenue records have been proved and the respondents unanimously prayed to the court to give me land in lieu of the land in dispute. Even the land was got measured by the then collector Kalika Pd. But it was never given to me. The execution of the order is still pending. The respondents did not move for cancellation of order passed on dated July 28, 1989. Since July 1987 my land is being usurped with the connivance of judiciary. The land records, on the basis of which, the court found interpolation, was again interpolated in the revenue records and my name is missing since 1994. A copy of the Khatauni is being attached with this application and is marked as Annexure- W8. In view of the section 197 of the CrPC read with Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution, judiciary is too impotent to book a public servant for any crime committed by a public servant without sanction from Governor. Governors are nominated by cow and man eater Sonia. (Bible, John 6:53).

      VIII.        That now, the applicant has arrived at the correct place in the disputed case. Now, judiciary would slap fine upon me for filing a case against the so called honest man (para 17 of the plaint). I would lose my land as per Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution read with sections 196 and 197 of the CrPC.

        IX.        That Judges take oath to uphold the Indian Constitution, which has snatched citizens' right to property, [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31], freedom of faith, (Azaan, Namaaz and Koran 2:191 and 21:98) right of life, {Azaan,  (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39), (Bible, Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5 and Luke 19:27) right of nation, and dignity of women. (Koran 23:6) and (Bible, Isaiah 13:16). The relegation of the above rights has been reinforced with the compilation of the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution by the Britons' Congress. Judges cannot save their own lives, properties and women; as such how would these slaves save the litigants? Whatever, crime the Rulers wished to commit with citizens, they did through judiciary.

          X.        It was the apex court which snatched citizens' right to property. (Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v UOI, AIR 1951 SC 458: 1052 SCR 89;) (Hiralal J. Kania CJ and 4 other JJs. Date decided 5-10-1951). It was the Calcutta High Court, which declared Jehovah and Allah gods and Bible and Koran religious books. (AIR 1985 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, 104). It was the apex court, which snatched right of maintenance of Muslim women in Shah Bano case. It was the apex court which granted salaries to Imaams and Hajj subsidy to Muslims, ignoring Article 27 of the Indian Constitution. (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086) and Writ Petition (civil) No.1 OF 2007 Prafull Goradia Petitioner(s) VERSUS Union of India Respondent(s). It was apex court, which tried Sati case of Roop Kunwar in Rajasthan. Thus, glorification of Sati is crime. Ex. Governor Narayan Dutt Tiwari has been forced to give blood sample for DNA test. So, our women are free for polygamy. Now its judiciary, which legalized sodomy. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1801037/ It is the apex court, which legalized live in relationship. http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1327342/ It is the Haryana High Court which permitted marriage between sister and brother. Now would be turn of Virgin mothers. UNO has already done it. 25(2) 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights'  "Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection." Judiciary would, like salaries to Imaams, rule that virgin mothers be rewarded by the Governments. Over and all judges have right to marry their daughters (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36) and daughter in laws. (Koran 33:37-38).

        XI.        That Hon'ble RG may forget me. Your Honour won’t survive. Humanity is in the jaws of two criminal cultures viz. Christianity and Islam. The perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed with violent and racist doctrines, which are, 'Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both have agenda, and Honour RG is ignorant of it. They have been created to reduce human beings into dinosaurs. Why should we allow such Indian Constitution survive, which has provided unfettered fundamental right to Muslims and Christians to slay us as per Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution?

       XII.        That Rulers, Judges, Governors, Leaders, reformers, saints, Media, Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving humanity. The truth is not hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. Good Muslims and Christians would continue to wage Jihad and Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means are petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivations are Koran and Bible. (Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). Non-violence is imposed upon Aryans only through [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and Sections 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

      XIII.        That on the one hand one has democracy of Briton's Congress and on the other hand Aryavrt Kingdom. In democracy citizens cannot have property and capital [Indian Constitution, DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY, Article 39(c) and cannot worship a god of one’s choice (Azaan and Koran 3:19). Aryavrt Government undertakes to provide citizens freedom of faith (Gita 7:21) and Right to Property (Manusmriti 8:308). We, the activists of Aryavrt Government and Abhinav Bharat are fighting total war against two criminal cultures, viz. Christianity and Islam.

     XIV.        That Azaan, broadcasted from mosques, is insult to our Ishwar and Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. We seek support of non-Muslims to abolish Azaan. While no enquiry commission was setup for demolishing our 108 temples in Kashmir alone, Read my book ‘Ajaan’ Annexure-10. We have legal right to slay every Imaam, who abuse Ishwar and preach slaughter of every Kafir. We are fighting to salvage Vedic culture. We want to stop loot of your houses, rape of your women before your own eyes and your genocide. (Bible, Isaiah 13:16). Our Bharat had several warriors, social reformers, saints and even kings. None of them fought against the root cause of human miseries viz. Christianity, Islam, Socialism, and Democracy. They had been fighting wars against the symptoms, not the sources. These cultures are fabricated to rob and enslave one and all. These cultures must go else human race won't survive. Since 300 B.C. we are the first to fight against real enemies. Our 9 officers are in jails for opposing these criminal regimens.

      XV.        That with the connivance of judiciary and the Indian Constitution, today, I have nothing to eat. I am living in Mangal Ashram, Rishikesh. I have no fare to reach Allahabad High Court. There is provision of advocate for poor persons like me. The court may appoint one for me. I can still appear in person, if the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court directs the applicant to send me return ticket between Haridwar Jn and Allahabad along with fooding and lodging.

Yours faithfully,

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi.

Mangal Ashram, Tihari mod, Rishikesh-249201

Dated; Monday, August 06, 2012y


Annexure-W1

खाता विवरण

 

ग्राम का नाम :

लच्छीपुर

परगना :

हवेली

तहसील :

सदर

खाता संख्या :

00074

जनपद :

गोरखपुर

फसली वर्ष :

1417-1422

भाग :

1

 

खातेदार का नाम

संरक्षक का नाम

निवास स्थान

खसरा सँख्या

क्षेत्रफल(हे.)

आदेश

टिप्पणी

_____________________

_____________________

_______________

__________

__________

____________________________________

____________

 

श्रेणी :

भूमि जो संक्रमणीय भूमिधरों के अधिकार में हो।

 

अयोध्या प्रसाद

वेनीमाधव

नि.ग्राम भुजहली तह.हाटा

467मि.

0.021

 


Annexure-W2

 

खाता विवरण

 

ग्राम का नाम :

लच्छीपुर

परगना :

हवेली

तहसील :

सदर

खाता संख्या :

02503

जनपद :

गोरखपुर

फसली वर्ष :

1417-1422

भाग :

1

 

 

खातेदार का नाम

संरक्षक का नाम

निवास स्थान

खसरा सँख्या

क्षेत्रफल(हे.)

आदेश

टिप्पणी

 

_____________________

_____________________

_______________

__________

__________

____________________________________

____________

श्रेणी :

भूमि जो संक्रमणीय भूमिधरों के अधिकार में हो।

 

 

श्रीमती फुलवा देवी

शिवमंगल

.

983मि.

0.020

पूर्व खतौन से -

रामकिशुन,सदानन्द

शिवमंगल

ग्राम नि.

467मि.

0.047

मूल पत्रावली से ना.तह.जंगल कौडॢया वाद

483मि.

0.032

सं.346/30.3.99आदेश दिया जाता है कि ग्राम लच्छीप

484मि.

0.032

तप्पा कस्वा परगना हवेली तह.सदर गोरखपुर क

गाटा सं.467मि./2412वर्गफीट मा.गु.60ख से हक व

से विक्रेता शिव मंगल पुत्र हेमराज नि.मु.लच्छी

शहर गोरखपुर का नाम निरस्त होकर क्रेता

वीरबहादुर तिवारी पुत्र केदारनाथ तिवारी नि.

मुक्तिपुर पोस्ट सीतापुरीकुन्ड तह.सदर जिला व्

क ा नाम संक्रमणीय भूमिधर दर्ज होवे।

मूल प्रत्रावली से ना.तह.जं.कौडॢया वाद सं.346

17.11.99वीरवहादुर बनाम शिवमंगल आदेश श्रीमान्

ना.तह.महोदय आदेश दिनाँक 17.11.99आदेश हुआ

आदेश दिनाँक 30.03.99निरस्त किया जाता है।

नायब तहसीलदार सदर वाद सं.2133/24-9-11आ.नं.

483मि.रकबा 0-08डि.यानि रकबा 3488वर्गफुट लगान

मु.परता 60ख से विक्रेतागण रामकिशुन व सदान

पुत्रगण शिवमंगल व श्रीमती फुलवा धर्मपत्नी शिव्

नि.मौजा लच्छीपुर हाल पता जंगल अयोध्या प्रसा

नाम खारिज करके क्रेता धनन्जय प्रसाद पुत्र राम्

प्रसाद नि.मौजा रामपुर नयागाँव तप्पा कस्बा प

तहसील सदर जिला गोरखपुर का नाम पंजीकृत

दि.12-7-11के आधार पर बतौर संक्रमणीय

भूमिधर दर्ज कागजात होवे।

 


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

ANNEXURE-W3

CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 1973 OF 2012

DISTT. : GORAKHPUR

VEER BAHADUR TIWARI  ………………….. APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER …………… OPPOSITE PARTIES.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

Court No.2 

Writ Petition No.125 (H/C) of 2011

Sukanya Devi and others --- Petitioners

Versus

State of U.P. and others --- Opp. Parties

Hon'ble Uma Nath Singh, J. 

Hon'ble Dr. Satish Chandra, J. 

Memo of appearance of Sri I.B. Singh, Senior Advocate, with Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate, filed under the signature of learned counsel on record Sri Shiv Chidambar in Court is taken on record. 

On 10.02.2011, writ petition No.111 (M/S) of 2011 for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus was filed with the following cause title: 

"(1) Sukanya Devi, aged about 24 years, D/o Balram Singh, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat, Madhya Pradesh. 

(2) Balram Singh, adult, S/o not known to the next friend, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat, Madhya Pradesh. 

(3) Sumitra Devi, adult, W/o Balram Singh, R/o 23-12, Medical Chowk, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., through her next friend Kishor Samrite, aged about 42 years, S/o Nanji Samrite, R/o Village & Post - Lanji, District Bala Ghat, Madhya Pradesh. -----Petitioners 

Versus

(1)State of U.P., through Principal Secretary (Home), Civil Secretariat, Lucknow. 

(2)Superintendent of Police, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. 

(3)Station House Officer, Police Station Amethi, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. 

(4)Commissioner of Police, New Delhi. (5)Station House Officer, Police Station Sansad Marg, New Delhi. 
(6)Rahul Gandhi, adult, S/o Late Rajiv Gandhi, R/o 10, Janpath, New Delhi. ----Respondents" 

The prayers for relief(s) as made in the writ petition are: 

"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus commanding the opposite parties, particularly opposite party no.6, to produce the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty; 

(II) Issue any other order or direction which it deems fit and proper in the present circumstances, in favour of the petitioners, in the interest of justice, and 

(III) Award the cost of petition to the petitioners." 

The writ petition is supported by an affidavit sworn in by one Kishor Samrite, Ex-MLA of Balaghat area of Madhya Pradesh who has claimed to be the next friend of the detenues. When the matter was listed on 01.03.2011 for preliminary hearing before a learned Single Judge of this Court, the following order was passed: 
"The petitioners claim their detention through their next friend, namely, Mr.Kishor Samrite under the custody of opposite party no.6 since 4th of January, 2007. 

Let notice be issued to the opposite party No.6 to submit reply. 

List after service report." 

It appears that having learnt about the contents of the above writ petition and the order passed therein, the instant writ petition was filed with the cause title as: 

"(1) Sukanya Devi, aged about 23 years, D/o Balram Singh, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend Gajendra Pal Singh, aged about 52 years, son of Jogindra Pal Singh, R/o Near Bus Station Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar. 

(2) Balram Singh, aged about 47 years, son of not known, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend and remote relative Sri Gajendra Pal Singh. 

(3) Sumitra alias Mohani Devi, aged about 42 years, R/o Near Gurudwara Ward No.5 Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. through next friend Gajendra Pal Singh, aged about 52 years, son of Jogindra Pal Singh, R/o Near Bus Station Town Area Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar. …………………………………………………………………..----Petitioners 

Versus 

1.The State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, U.P. Government, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow. 

2.Superintendent of Police Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P. 
3.Station House Officer, Police Station Amethi, District Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P.

 ----- Respondents" 

The prayer part of the writ petition on reproduction reads as: 

"(a) Issue a writ or writ order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus commanding the opposite parties to produce the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty; 

(b) to call the record of writ petition no.111 (H/C) of 2011 and connect with this present writ petition.

The order passed in writ petition no.111 (H/C) of 2011 be reviewed and recalled; 

(c) to order the investigation by the appropriate agency; 

(d) Issue any other order or direction which is deemed fit and proper in the present circumstances in favour of the petitioners, in the interest of justice, and 
(e) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioners." 

The matter came up for preliminary hearing before this Bench on 04.03.2011 when the following order was passed: 

"This writ petition has been filed with the prayers for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus (i) commanding the opposite parties to produce the petitioners before this Court so as to set them at liberty; (ii) calling for the record of Writ Petition No.111 (H/C) of 2011 pending before the Court of a learned Single Judge and to connect it with this writ petition, and (iii) ordering investigation by some appropriate independent agency as this Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of this case. 

The main purpose of filing a writ petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus is to seek production of detenue from illegal detention of public authorities or private persons and a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution would not lie without the State or its instrumentalities being a party in terms of Article 12 thereof. It is essentially the duty of State authorities to ensure the maintenance of law and order, and to produce a detenue from illegal custody/detention if so directed by a Court. Though under the Allahabad High Court Rules, a Proviso was added in 1976 conferring powers also upon learned Single Judges to issue writ of habeas corpus in the matter of private detention (which has further added to the mounting pendency) but prima facie, it seems to be encroaching upon the powers entrusted to Magistrate under Section 97 of Cr.P.C. to seek production from a wrongful confinement which is an offence punishable under Section 342 IPC. These provisions on reproduction read as: 

"97. Search for persons wrongfully confined--If any District Magistrate, Sub-divisional Magistrate or Magistrate of the first class has reason to believe that any person is confined under such circumstances that the confinement amounts to an offence, he may issue a search-warrant, and the person to whom such warrant is directed may search for the person so confined; and such search shall be made in accordance therewith, and the person, if found, shall be immediately taken before a Magistrate, who shall make such order as in the circumstances of the case seems proper." 

"342- Punishment for wrongful confinement.--Whoever wrongfully confines any person shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both."

In view of the aforesaid clear provisions and remedy, a question that also needs to be examined is as to whether a writ of habeas corpus would lie in the case of a private detention as provided under the rules. 

Issue notice to the Registrar General, Allahabad High Court to submit his reply within four weeks. 
In view of all the aforesaid, we direct that the records of Writ Petition No.111 (H/C) of 2011, said to be pending before a learned Single Judge, shall be connected with this writ petition. Besides, we also direct that the Director General of Police, U.P., shall produce the petitioners, in particular, Sukanya Devi, on the next date of hearing i.e. 7.3.2011. However, we make it clear that this direction to the Director General of Police, U.P., shall not be construed to mean that the detenu is in illegal custody of State authorities and the Director General of Police, U.P., in this case shall function only as an officer of the Court for the purpose of production of detenu. 

Let a copy of this order be served upon the Director General of Police, U.P., forthwith on fax by the Registrar of this Court for immediate compliance. Additionally, a copy of this order shall also be issued to the Government Counsel for doing the needful. 

List on 7.3.2011." 

Pursuant to the order dated 04.03.2011, Dr. Balram Singh, his daughter Kirti Singh (who has been wrongly mentioned as 'Sukanya Devi) and wife Smt. Sushila @ Mohnini Devi (wrongly mentioned as 'Sumitra') are produced in Court. Dr. Balram Singh states that all the allegations made in the Habeas Corpus petition, namely, 111(HC) of 2011 are false and scandalous and he is rather shocked on being told about wild allegations made against political leader Shri Rahul Gandhi, Member of Parliament from Amethi. He pleads complete ignorance about the alleged incident. 

Kirti Singh, daughter of Shri Balram Singh, states that she is aged about 22 years and has passed B.Sc. examination. Presently, she is preparing to appear at B.Ed. Examination. She also categorically denies the allegations made in the writ petition and states that all such averments are false and scandalous. 
Smt. Sushila, mother of Kirti Singh (wrongly mentioned as Sukanya Devi), condemns the allegation made against Sri Rahul Gandhi and states that all those persons who have made such false allegations should be severely punished. 

All the three detenues produced in the Court, by the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, who himself is present in Court, are identified by Sri Prem Pal Singh, In-charge of District Crime Record Bureau (DCRB), District Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Nagar. 

At this stage, it is also pointed out by learned Advocate General appearing for the State that the addresses of detenues given in Writ Petition No.111 (H/C) of 2011 filed before the learned Single Judge are also absolutely wrong. 

Contrary to the stand taken by the detenues, in writ petition No.111(H/C) of 2011 filed before the learned Single Judge, some scandalous averments which can be termed as "abhorrent, atrocious and horrendous" have also been made. Such averments in a polity like ours with comparatively low literacy rate (and even some of the literate are also uneducated) can impair the credibility and reputation of a man in public life or holding high public office beyond repairs and redemption which are generally built up brick by brick over a period of time. These averments are also reproduced as under: 
"6. That, to bring home the point, certain important facts are being brought into the kind notice of this Hon'ble Court as follows: the petitioners are resident of Amethi, Chhatrapti Shahu Ji Mahraj Nagar, U.P., which falls in the parliamentary constituency of Amethi. The said constituency is being represented by the private opposite party no.6 in the Parliament of India. 
7.That, petitioner no.2 is a Congress worker in Amethi constituency. The private opposite party no.6 belongs to the Indian National Congress Party. Petitioner no.1 is daughter of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3. 
8.That, the next friend came to know from certain websites viz. Www.indybay.org, www.arizona.indymedia.org, which contain various news items including this one that in the night of 03.12.2006, while on tour of his parliamentary constituency of Amethi, the private opposite party no.6 committed rape on the petitioner no.1, along with six of his friends; two of them were of Italy and 4 were from Britain. Such news reports as published on different web sites are part of the Annexure No.2 herein." 

Though headlines like 'corruption and scandals' are the regular high lights of the electronic and print media but still a large section of our population is honest and dedicated which alone has made the survival of our largest democracy possible through a difficult evolution process with unhealthy contradictions like the one as contained in the averments of writ petition as referred to herein above. Can our country with 120 crore population which seems to be living in the state of uneasy calm afford to provide level fields for cheap gimmicks players? If not, then should we not find out a solution so that those who are duly appointed or elected to high public offices after following the procedures as established by Law, be it Executive or Legislature or Judiciary, need not struggle in Courts or other fora just for their survival in the system. But now what we notice that instead of extending cooperation and support and providing conducive working environment to get optimal result out of the functioning of such authorities, people with vested interests start rubbing them all over till they are finished to fit in and disappear in the black hole of corruption. Today every process of selection or election starts with venom and ends in disdain. Thus now it is a high time that the legislature should think to bring a suitable legislation to protect the high public functionaries from being blackmailed by the black sheeps who are present inside and outside the system so that they feel secure in the course of discharge of their duties. Under these premises till the other organs of State ponder over to bring suitable measures/legislations etc. it would be expedient in the interest of justice that in the exercise of our powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, we take this matter to its logical conclusion by following the idea of the great political thinker and Roman philosopher Plato who has said that 'virtue can and must be taught'. 

In view of all the aforesaid and particularly for the reason that the writ petition No.111 (H/C) of 2011 was filed on the instructions of Kishor Samrite (who has also sworn the affidavit in support of the writ petition) which contained wild allegations/insinuation against Shri Rahul Gandhi and questions the virtue and modesty of a young girl of 22 years Km. Kirti Singh, we dismiss this writ petition with a cost of Rs.50,00,000/- (Fifty lacs). Out of the cost amount, Rs.25,00,000/- (Twenty five lacs) shall be paid to Km. Kirti Singh and Rs.20,00,000/- (Twenty lacs) to Shri Rahul Gandhi, opposite party no.6. The cost amount shall be deposited within a period of one month with the Registrar of this Court, failing which, the Registrar shall take necessary action for recovery of the amount as land revenue. 

We also record our special note of appreciation for Shri Karamveer Singh, Director General of Police, U.P. (a highly decorated police officer), for producing the alleged detenues within the time frame as directed in the order. Thus, for all the promptness and sincerity shown, in the midst of serious law and order problems all over the State on account of some agitation, in obeying and complying with the directions, we direct payment of Rs.5,00,000/- (five lacs) towards a reward to the DGP. We also record our appreciation for Shri Jyotindra Misra, learned Advocate General and the State Government for showing concern in this matter. 

We also direct the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, to register case against Kishor Samrite, the websites referred to in Writ Petition No.111 (H/C) of 2011, and all other persons who are found involved in the plot, if any, hatched in order to frame up Shri Rahul Gandhi, Member of Parliament from Amethi. We also appreciate Shri Gajendra Pal Singh, author of Writ Petition No.125 (H/C) of 2011 for approaching this Court in order to save the reputation of Shri Rahul Gandhi and the family of alleged detenues at the hands of vested interests responsible for filing Writ Petition No.111(H/C) of 2011. 

Till the investigation continues and the websites in question are not cleared by the CBI, their display in India shall remain banned. The Director, CBI, shall ensure compliance of this order forthwith. He shall also prepare a list of such other websites which are involved in display of scandalous informations about the functionaries holding high public offices and submit a report in respect thereof on the next date of hearing. 

Thus, writ petition no.125 (H/C) of 2011 is partly disposed of to the extent insofar as it relates to production of the alleged detenues. However, it shall remain pending in respect of notice issued to the Registrar General, Allahabad High Court and for the submission of report by the CBI as directed herein above. The matter shall remain part heard. 

List the matter on 11.04.2011 for further hearing. 

The Registrar of this Court shall issue copy of this order to all the concerned parties including the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, for immediate compliance. 

07.03.2011 

A. Katiyar 


http://www.aryavrt.com/rti-against-delay-in-trial


Annexure-W4

RTI against delay in trial

 Format of Application for obtaining information under ‘The Right to Information Act 2005’

TO,

The Public Information Officer, District Judge, Civil Court, Gorakhpur- 273001

1. FULL NAME OF APPLICANT : Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi,

2. ADDRESS : 77 Khera Khurd, Delhi 110 082

3. PARTICULARS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED

(i) Subject matter of information : That a criminal case bearing case No. 7024 of 2000  State of UP V/s Shiv Mangal and Revision are under trial in Civil Court Gorakhpur and the courts could not serve even charge-sheet to the accused persons. However, the case of Rahul was decided in record time of 7 days.

197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.

(1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not

removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any

offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the

discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the

previous sanction-

(a) In the case of it person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of

commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the Union, of

the Central Government;

(b) In the case of a person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of

commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of a State, of the

State Government:

(iii) Description of information required : (Details may be attached on additional A4 size paper if required)

(iv) Whether information is required by post or in person : By post

(v) In case by post (Ordinary, Registered or Speed) : Speed post

I want information as to how many years the court would take in deciding the case?

What action the Governor would take against the judges for delay in the case?

4. WHETHER THE APPLICANT IS BELOW POVERTY LINE : No.

Place : Khera Khurd, Delhi

Date : Thursday, December 01, 2011y                                                                     Signature of the applicant

Reply of RTI

कार्यालय जन सूचना अधिकारी/अपर जिला जज, गोरखपुर.

आदेश

श्री अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी के जन सूचना अधिकार अधिनियम – २००५ के अंतर्गत दिए गए प्रार्थना पत्र

दिनांकित १.१२.२०११ का अवलोकन किया गया| आवेदक ने फौजदारी वाद संख्या २०७४/२००० स्टेट

ऑफ उ० प्र० बनाम शिवमंगल के सम्बन्ध में सूचना मांगी है| इलाहबाद उच्च न्यायलय (सूचना का

अधिकार) नियम २००६ के अनुसार –

Cental Public Information Officer will not entertain any

Application from any citizen for any information relating

to matters, which are pending adjudication before the high

court or courts subordinate thereto. The information relating

to judicial matters may be obtained as per the procedure

prescribed in the Allahabad High Court Rules 1952 and General

Rules (Civil/Criminal) respectively.”

दिनांक ०८.१२.२०११

ह्स्ताछरित दिनांक ०८.१२.२०११.

(जय प्रकाश)

अपर जिला जज, गोरखपुर.

जन सूचना अधिकारी,

दीवानी न्यायलय, गोरखपुर

मुहर

ANNEXURE-W5

No. L.15012/10/2011-Jus

Government of India

Ministry of Law and Justice

Department of Justice

****

Jaisalmer House, Man Singh Road,

New Delhi Dated 22nd March, 2011

To,

The Registrar General,

Allahabad High Court,

Allahabad – 211011.

Sub: Representation dated 03.02.2011 of Shri Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, Delhi.

Sir,

I am directed forward herewith a Representation dated 03.02.2011 (in original) of Shri Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, 77-Khera Khurd, Delhi-110082 received through President’s Secretariat vide their letter No. P1/E/1502110043 dated 15.02.2011 for appropriate action.

2. It is requested that the grievance/reference may be looked into at the earliest intimation to the applicant and this Department.

Yours faithfully,

 

(S.C. Mishra)

Under Secretary to the Government of India,

Tele# 23073178

Encls: As Above.

Copy for information to,

1. Shri K.C. Jayarajan, Addl Comptroller, Rashtrapati Bhawan, New Delhi vide their letter No. P1/E/1502110043 dated 15.02.2011

2. Shri Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, 77-Khera Khurd, Delhi-110082

(S.C. Mishra)

Under Secretary to the Government of India,

 

 


http://www.aryavrt.com/nl-anne-1-3

http://www.aryavrt.com/nl-anne-1-3

ANNEXURE-W6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

*-*-*-*-*-*

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 9672 OF 1988

District:-Gorakhpur

Shiv Ashrey Tiwari and others ..........Petitioners

versus

Ist . Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and others....Respdts.

REPORT/ORDER OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR, DT. 28.7.1989

Hon. Ravi S. Dhavan,J.

In compliance of your Lordship’s order, I checked annexure No. RA-5 and RA-6 on the record of writ Petition No. 9672/88 Sheo Asrey Tewari & anothers Vs. I Addl. District Judge & another in respect of plot no. 927 of village Turkamanpur Tappa Kasba Pargana Haveli Sadar Gorkhpur of the year 1323 fasli and 1295 fasli and found that conversation of the land from bigha to acres is correct.

In Khasra of village Turkmanpur(Collector’s record) of 1322 fasli, there are two sets of plots, against Plot no. 927, one set consists of sub -plot no,881, 882, 883 and 888. Another set consists of sub plot no. 875-876-877 and 878. In column no. 3 total area is written to be. 7.32 acre. But in Fard Mutabiqat (Comparative table) of 1322 fasli(Lekhpsl’s record) of village Turkmanpur plot no. 927 consists of sub-plots 881, 882,883,884,885, 875, 876, 877, 878 and 886. Thus, there addition of plot nos. 884 ,885 after plot no. 888 and 886 after plot no. 878 in Lekhpal’s record and both the records do not tally.

Against the original entry of plot no. 878, figure ‘8’was added on left side to make it read as ‘887’. Thereafter figure ‘8’ on the left side of original figure was cut. This gives impression that it can be read as 878 and 887 both. At page 99, there are cutting but no official has signed on such cutting.

As directed by your Lordship, Urdu, Hindi and English transliteration of the relevant records has been done, which is attached herewith for your Lordship’s kind perusal.

Submitted for kind perusal and order.

Sd/-K.N.Ojha

Joint Registrar ©

28-07-1989

TRUE COPY

Sd. Illegible 3.9.90

S.O.COPYING’D’ SECTION

HIGH COURT ALLAHABAD.

 


\

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

*******

(ANNEXURE-W7)

IN

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 9672 OF 1988

District:-Gorakhpur

Shiv Ashrey Tiwari and others ..........Petitioners

versus

Ist . Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and others....Respdts.

HIGH COURT, ALLAHABAD

ORDER-SHEET

9-8-1989

Hon: Ravi S. Dhavan

Present:


The petitioner No. 2 in person, Mr. G.L. Tripathi Standing Counsel on behalf of state of U.P. Mr. S. Mandyan, Advocate for Respondent No. 4, holding the brief of Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate, Mr. K.B. Mathur, Advocate otherwise standing counsel, U.P. for Respondent No. 5.

The petitioner No. 2 has filed an affidavit with eleven annexures, which with the exception of one refer to the land records, otherwise in the possession of the district administration i.e. the State. A copy of this affidavit has already been delivered to counsel for the parties.

All the Respondents have jointly and unanimously prayed and requested the court that the matter be adjourned for today as they feel that the matter needs to be discussed with the Collector and District Magistrate, Gorakhpur. The reason for short adjournment was explained by learned counsel aforesaid. Regard being had to the record as of date, including certified copies of land records filed today, a short adjournment over the week-end was desired to obtain instructions. It was further contended that in consultation with the Collector/ District Magistrate party Respondents would seek instructions to suggest a proposal if another tract of land contiguous to that in the possession of petitioner, as of date, can be made available, subject to such orders as may be passed by this court, so that the interest of all parties can be protected. The request for adjournment, to let the Collector and District Magistrate consider the matter is not unreasonable. The matter is thus adjourned to be listed on August 18, 1989, as August 15 and 17 are public holidays.

After the aforesaid order was passed and at the rising of the court, Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate entered appearance to insist that the matter be taken up as unlisted tomorrow. The Court requested learned counsel to be briefed by his colleagues in this case on the proceedings as are on record, during his absence, as the request for adjournment may ultimately see a solution and end litigation. Learned counsel insisted that the District Magistrate Gorakhpur has nothing to do with the matter and that he must have his say.

As the matter cannot proceed beyond court hours in any case, place as unlisted tomorrow so that Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate, may have his say on whatever he contends. Let the record be before the court.

Sd. Ravi S. Dhavan, J.

TRUE COPY

Annexure-W8

नकल खतौनी सन १४०१ फसली बावत मौजा तुर्कमानपुर तप्पा क़स्बा, परगना हवेली, तहसील सदर, जिला गोरखपुर|

................

२१३ अयोध्या प्रसाद तिवारी पुत्र १० वर्ष       ९२७मि -२० २=००

प्रतिलिपि विभाग, गोरखपुर की मुहर|

फसली सन १४०१ / ई० सन० १९९४ के बाद से राजस्व अभिलेख से मेरा नाम गायब है|

लोकसेवकों के पास दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९७ से मिले संरक्षण में नागरिकों को लूटने का अधिकार भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) से प्राप्त है|

पूर्व राज्यपाल नारायण दत्त तिवारी ने त्याग पत्र दे दिया| मधु कोड़ा और येदियुरप्पा जेल चले गए| सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के मुख्य जज केजी बालाकृष्णन की जांच जारी है| आप कब जेल जायेंगे?

याद रखें! सरकार का मतलब ईसा की भेंड़ सोनिया है| ईसा १० करोड़ से अधिक अमेरिकी लाल भारतीयों और उनकी माया संस्कृति को निगल गया| अब सोनिया काले भारतीयों और उनकी वैदिक संस्कृति को निगल रही है| सोनिया के सहयोग से अर्मगेद्दन के पश्चात ईसा जेरूसलम को अपनी अंतर्राष्ट्रीय राजधानी बनाएगा| ममता व भूत पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री मुलायम के प्रिय इस्लाम सहित सभी मजहबों और संस्कृतियों को निषिद्ध कर देगा| केवल ईसा और उसके चित्र की पूजा हो सकेगी| बाइबल के अनुसार ईसा यहूदियों के मंदिर में ईश्वर बन कर बैठेगा और मात्र अपनी पूजा कराएगा| हिरण्यकश्यप की दैत्य संस्कृति न बची और केवल उसी की पूजा तो हो न सकी, अब ईसा की बारी है| विशेष विवरण नीचे की लिंक पर पढ़ें,

http://www.countdown.org/armageddon/antichrist.htm

 

आप लोग कितने अभागे हैं? अपने हाथों अपनी कब्र खोद रहे हैं|

मै डेनिअल वेबस्टर के कथन से पूरी तरह सहमत हूँहमको मिटाने के लिए किसी भी राष्ट्र के पास शक्ति नहीं है. हमारा विनाश, यदि आएगा तो वह दूसरे प्रकार से आएगा. वह होगा सरकार के षड्यंत्र के प्रति जनता की लापरवाही. ... मुझे भय है कि जनता अपने उन लोकसेवकों पर अत्यधिक विश्वास करेगी, जिन्हें स्वयं अपने ही सर्वनाश के लिए (सोनिया द्वारा) हथियार बना लिया गया है.

भारतीय संविधान का संकलन एक धोखा है| इसका संकलन वैदिक सनातन धर्म को मिटाने के लिए किया गया है| इंडिया आज भी ब्रिटिश उपनिवेश है {भारतीय संविधान का अनुच्छेद ६(ब)(||)} और राष्ट्रकुल का एक सदस्य भी| स्वतंत्र कोई नहीं|

भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद २९(१) का संकलन कर वैदिक सनातन धर्म के अनुयायियों की आर्थिक व धार्मिक स्वतंत्रता, धरती, देश, सम्पत्ति व नारियां उनसे चुरा कर संयुक्त रूप से शासकों को सौँप दिया गया है| दास मुसलमान और ईसाई लोगों को लड़ कर यह निर्णय कर लेना चाहिए कि विश्व पर अधिकार मुसलमानों का रहेगा या ईसाइयों का. यहाँ भी एक समस्या है. जीते चाहे कोई, रहेगा वह शासक (सोनिया) का दास ही!

मुक्ति चाहें तो हुतात्मा रामप्रसाद बिस्मिल की ३.३ एकड और मेरी १.६८ एकड + ०.२० एकड+०.०५ एकड भूमि वापस करने में मेरी सहायता करें| हम ईसाइयत और इस्लाम को मिटा देंगे|

ईश्वर आप का कल्याण करें|

अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी (सूचना सचिव) आर्यावर्त सरकार| सम्पर्क करें (०)९१५२५७९०४१

बुधवार, 11 जुलाई 2012

पेंशन प्रकरण:

 मैं नवम्बर सन १९६६ से २००० तक उप्र सिचाई विभाग में सेवा रत रहा| मैं सिचाई विभाग में अवर अभियंता था| राज्य लोकसेवा न्यायाधिकरण (ट्रिब्यूनल) में याचिका डालने के कारण मुझे नौकरी से निकाल दिया गया| २९-११-१९९४ में ट्रिब्यूनल का फैसला मेरे पक्ष में हुआ| काफी प्रयास के बाद भी मुझे आज तक पेंशन नहीं दी जा रही है और न कोई सुनवाई हो रही है|

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=YXJ5YXZydC5jb218bWFsZWdhb24tdHJpYWx8Z3g6MWNjOGEyMjdmYTlkMzk3NA

http://www.aryavrt.com/pension

http://www.aryavrt.com/pension-sat

मैं लगभग २ अरब रुपयों की सम्पत्ति का स्वामी हूँ| भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) के अधिकार से राजस्व अभिलेखो में हेरा फेरी कर लोकसेवकों ने मेरी १.८८ एकड़ भूमि लूट ली| इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने अपनी जांच में जालसाजी २८ जुलाई, १९८९ को प्रमाणित की है| इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने अपराधी लोकसेवकों को दंडित नहीं किया लेकिन ९-८-१९८९ को सभी विपक्षियों की सहमति पर बदले में भूमि देने का आदेश पारित किया| उपरोक्त आदेशों के विरुद्ध कोई अपील भी नहीं की गई है| लेकिन मुझे भूमि आज तक नहीं दी गई| न्यायपालिका से आदेश होते हुए भी ९ अगस्त, १९८९ से अपनी ही भूमि पर जा भी नहीं सकता|

http://www.aryavrt.com/muj11w15c-jan-lokpal

सोनिया का ऐसा आतंक है कि न तो मैं अपनी जमीन ही पा सकता हूँ और न पेंशन ही| सोनिया के पास मुझे मिटाने का अधिकार (बाइबल, लूका १९:२७) व भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) व २९(१) से प्राप्त है| सोनिया के पास जजों को मुट्ठी में रखने का अधिकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९७ से प्राप्त है|

इतना ही नहीं, चूंकि मैं हुतात्मा बिस्मिल के स्मारक से जुड़ा था, इसलिए सोनिया के दबाव में मुलायम ने हुतात्मा रामप्रसाद बिस्मिल की ३.३ एकड और मेरी १.८८ एकड व २१० वर्ग मीटर भूमि लूटी हुई है| जिसके बलिदान के कारण आप लोग मुख्यमंत्री, राष्ट्रपति और राज्यपाल बने, जब उसे ही नहीं छोड़ा, तो किसे छोड़ेंगे?

 खेड़ाखुर्द विस्तार के पंजीकृत कालनी में मेरा एक स्व अर्जित - अर्ध निर्मित भूखंड है| इस भूमि पर मेरे अपने ही पुत्रों ने ताला तोड़ कर अधिकार कर लिया है| इसके पूर्व ६ मार्च से ११ मार्च, २०१३ के बीच मेरे पुत्रों ने मुझे गोरखपुर में बंधक बनाया था| इसकी सूचना तार द्वारा मैंने उप्र व केन्द्र सरकार दोनों को दी थी, परन्तु कोई कार्यवाही नहीं हुई| इस समय मामला अतिरिक्त जिलाधिकारी उत्तर दिल्ली के पास लम्बित है और मैं ऋषिकेश में भीख मांगने के लिये विवश हूँ| मामला न्यायालय में विचाराधीन हो गया है| सन १९८९ के इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय के बिना विचाराधीन आदेश का कुछ न हो सका| सोनिया के कठपुतली जजों के विचाराधीन मामले में हो ही क्या सकता है?

http://www.aryavrt.com/kland-forcible-dispossession

Your Request/Grievance Registration Number is : PRSEC/E/2013/11308

http://helpline.rb.nic.in/


Comments