Read and forward it in
the service of humanity.
Fight the source not the
Your moral and Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution
The Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution has
granted unfettered fundamental right to conserve the booby trap, predator, rapist and
killer cultures named Christianity and Islam. Since January 26, 1950 no one questioned the Article 29(1) of
the Indian Constitution.
Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution
that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay and rob the
people of alien faiths and rape their women? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are
duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in
Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties and capital of the
By way of 'Circumcision' and wine the Christians
and Muslims have been reduced so stupid that no one among Abrahamic faiths
could understand, since 2060 BC, that these are immoral sects and they are
being cheated by their clerics and rulers for personal gains of clerics and
Christianity and Islam have redefined morality.
Depose faith in Jehovah (Bible, Isaiah
13:15 and 16) ravish any alien women of your choice, depose faith in Jesus
marry your own daughters, (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36), depose faith in Allah
(Koran, 23:6 and 70:30) rape any alien
woman, including Mamta and Sonia, of your choice and marry your
daughter-in-laws (Koran, 33:37-38) and remain scot-free. No sooner one converts
into either in Islam, or Judaism, or Christianity or Socialism, one turns slave
and the criminal activities of murder, plunder and rape of women ceased to be
considered crimes instead these crimes turn into the source of sustenance and
heaven after death.
Your moral:Article 39(c) and omitted Article 31 of the
Indian Constitution are not corruption.
DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY
"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the
State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –
(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result
in the concentration of wealth
and means of production to the common detriment;"
197. Prosecution of Judges
and public servants.
(1) When any person
who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his
office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence
alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the
discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence
except with the previous sanction- ... of the Government
No one could dare to question the above Articles and section
since 1950 A.D. Our Jagatguru questioned as such is languishing in jail.
As long as a dictator proletariat extorts money, loots
citizens, commits scam and shares booty with Sonia and her tools and vassals,
he gets protection u/s 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While Sonia loots
the reader through public servants by blackmailing the public servants, the
section quoted above, ensures delivery of share in the booty to Sonia. When
booty is not shared, the act becomes corruption.
Suppose, all the parked black money in foreign banks and
scam money returns to the exchequer, then, how the common man would benefit,
when 95% of the money is being siphoned off by Sonia and her tools and vassals?
In fact Jan Lokpal would add another usurper of booty.
However, omission of Article 39(c) and sec 197 and revival of Article 31 would
ensure the real economic freedom of the citizens.
The above Article and section has reduced every citizen of
India into sheep of sheep Sonia like cattle of peasant.
Scramble for Booty
There is scramble for booty and slaves around the whole
world. Vedic Morals, which provide right to properties (Manusmriti 8:308)) and freedom
of faith (Gita 7:21) are stumbling-blocks. Therefore, Christianity and Islam
have been detained in India with special rights vides Article 29(1) of the
Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. As per the Indian
Constitution and prevailing laws in India, there is no law to conserve Vedic
Sanaatan Dharm. Moses, the founder of immorality on the pretext of religion,
was the first person who moralized Booty, (Bible Deut. 20:14), rape of women (Bible Isaiah 13:15-16) and
subjugation of humanity through his religion Judaism and his domestic servant
Jehovah on the pretext of ban on worshipping alien gods. (Bible Exodus/ Chapter
20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5). Jesus, a pirate, improved the booty
further. He moralized eating flesh of the son of man and drinking his blood
(Bible, John 6:53) and slaughter of one who does not accept Jesus his ruler.
(Bible, Luke, 19:27). Muhammad, another pirate, made Allah the owner of booty,
(Koran 8:01, 41 and 69) killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17) rapist of women
(Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 and 70:30) and owner of the world. (Koran 2:255).
Still Jesus and Muhammad provided limited right of booty to their followers.
Property is power. Remaining in the hands of citizens, property prevents their
subjugation and servitude. Therefore, Carl Marx invested property into the
immoral, corrupt and usurper society. Democracy is blend of all above to
eradicate Vedic culture and enslave one.
Now compare Ishwar with these Gods! While Jehovah has two
brokers named Moses and Jesus, Allah has one alone named Muhammad? Any one can
meet Ishwar direct after performing Yoga or Kundalini Jagran. Ishwar has no
broker. (Gita 7:21). No one can meet Jehovah and Allah. So why should one
worship these impotent and criminal gods named Jehovah and Allah, who make one
slave, instigate one for murder, plunder, incest and rape of women of alien
faiths and forbid one from worshiping a god of one’s choice, in lieu of Ishwar
who gives one unfettered right to worship any god of one’s choice? Look! The
notorious democracy calls this status of servility, liberty of faith and
secularism! Therefore, the suggestion to these followers of criminal prophets
is to relinquish their prophets and come into the fold of great and omnipresent
Vedic culture. Do not believe in and do not accept religious servility for sex,
booty and slave. Come to my fold, I would provide you liberty to worship a God
of your own choice, says Ishwar in Gita, See Chapter 7 Shloka 21.
Through the very tailor compiled Article 29(1) of the Indian
Constitution by Jesus’ Congress, the criminal Muslims and Christians have been
provided unfettered fundamental right to conserve their culture i.e. in fact
right to liquidate or enslave every human being of the globe.
Victims of faiths
The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated a new
way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These
prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they
have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those, who accept the faith of
prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of
Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of
the prophets become slaves of their prophets. By providing incentives of booty
and sex, the prophets got killed those who did not accept their faiths. Thus
the whole world came under the control of the prophets. The prophets died and
left behind their legacies to clerics and rulers. Why should one believe? Why
not may one search Ishwar either by Yog or Kundalini Jagran? However, these monopolies
of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like
This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from
blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who
have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of
the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)?
If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is
justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been
commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible,
Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the
democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to
property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits?
If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the
moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves?
The fundamental Right to Property provided vide Article 31
of the Indian Constitution could not be snatched even by the Britons and the
Constitution Committee. This Article 31 was amended by the dacoit
Parliamentarians and upheld by the apex Court. Now the Article has been omitted
from the Constitution since 20-06-1979.
Eradication of human race is imminent. Human race has lost
wisdom. A Government that extorts taxes over 17% of the produce is
extortionist. (Manusmriti 8:308). A religion that snatches liberty of worship
cannot be secular. (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). The
words, "Public Interest" and "Social Justice" are weapons
to usurp the belongings of the haves. The end payers of corporate tax, VAT and
even Income tax are poor people. The public servants, industrialists and
traders are being forced to loot the poor and pass the booty to the rulers. (in
the instant case Sonia). If one says that the tax is used for the welfare of
poor, one is patently wrong. Bofor Chor Rajiv Gandhi, the so-called Mr. clean,
had already told the nation in 1985 that 85% money of exchequer was being siphoned
off by the intermediaries during his tenure. Now the position has further
deteriorated; as per his son Rahul only 5% is reaching to the people. Look!
Poor Jehovah has no share in booty. Poor Allah takes 20% only. (Koran 8:41).
However, Pratibha and thief Antonia Maino and their servants gallop 95% of the
exchequer as per the admission of the ex PM and his son Rahul of this dreaded
I am providing a link having 2 orders of Allahabad High Court for the
perusal of reader,
Annexure 1 proves interpolation of revenue record by none
other than the servants of Sonia, the super PM of India. Due to the constraints
of section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the helpless judge, as per
Annexure-2, could not punish the culprits. However, the poor judge suggested delivering
me land in lieu of the land grabbed by the servants of land mafia Sonia. I am still ready
to accept land of equal value. Could Jan-Lokpal override the Indian
Constitution and Criminal Procedure Code and dare to do justice with me?
There are imminent persons in this agitation viz. ‘India against
corruption’. One man may commit mistake. Every one cannot. I am writing
eversince the agitation started, viz. April 05, 2011. Even after my warning, if
these people do not respond, I can safely blame these people that they are
scuttling the real war against corruption. They have sold their souls to Sonia,
the dreaded tyrant, for their personal gains. They are immoral people and
enemies of humanity.
I appeal every human being, including the public servants
themselves, to help us fight the real enemy, the Indian Constitution. I
know, I would be dragged in gallows like Shri Anupam Kher. Shri Kher admitted
that he respects the Indian Constitution, however I hate predator and pirate
Indian Constitution as it has been compiled and imposed upon the nation with
lies, lies and lies and nothing else.
If the reader feels that my above comments are true, they
may help us underhand and pass this message to maximum persons he can.
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi (Press Secretary),
Dated; Delhi: Tuesday, May 24, 2011.