Home‎ > ‎

Agents of Sonia

Appeal:

Read and forward it in the service of humanity.

Fight the source not the symptom.

Morality redefined

Your moral and Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution

The Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution has granted unfettered fundamental right to conserve the booby trap, predator, rapist and killer cultures named Christianity and Islam. Since January 26, 1950 no one questioned the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution.

Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay and rob the people of alien faiths and rape their women? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties and capital of the citizens?

By way of 'Circumcision' and wine the Christians and Muslims have been reduced so stupid that no one among Abrahamic faiths could understand, since 2060 BC, that these are immoral sects and they are being cheated by their clerics and rulers for personal gains of clerics and rulers.

Christianity and Islam have redefined morality. Depose faith in Jehovah (Bible,  Isaiah 13:15 and 16) ravish any alien women of your choice, depose faith in Jesus marry your own daughters, (Bible, 1 Corinthians 7:36), depose faith in Allah (Koran,  23:6 and 70:30) rape any alien woman, including Mamta and Sonia, of your choice and marry your daughter-in-laws (Koran, 33:37-38) and remain scot-free. No sooner one converts into either in Islam, or Judaism, or Christianity or Socialism, one turns slave and the criminal activities of murder, plunder and rape of women ceased to be considered crimes instead these crimes turn into the source of sustenance and heaven after death.

 
Your moral:Article 39(c) and omitted Article 31 of the Indian Constitution are not corruption. 
 

Indian Constitution

DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –

(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;"

197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.

 (1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction- ... of the Government

No one could dare to question the above Articles and section since 1950 A.D. Our Jagatguru questioned as such is languishing in jail.

As long as a dictator proletariat extorts money, loots citizens, commits scam and shares booty with Sonia and her tools and vassals, he gets protection u/s 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While Sonia loots the reader through public servants by blackmailing the public servants, the section quoted above, ensures delivery of share in the booty to Sonia. When booty is not shared, the act becomes corruption.

Suppose, all the parked black money in foreign banks and scam money returns to the exchequer, then, how the common man would benefit, when 95% of the money is being siphoned off by Sonia and her tools and vassals?

In fact Jan Lokpal would add another usurper of booty. However, omission of Article 39(c) and sec 197 and revival of Article 31 would ensure the real economic freedom of the citizens.

The above Article and section has reduced every citizen of India into sheep of sheep Sonia like cattle of peasant.


Scramble for Booty


There is scramble for booty and slaves around the whole world. Vedic Morals, which provide right to properties (Manusmriti 8:308)) and freedom of faith (Gita 7:21) are stumbling-blocks. Therefore, Christianity and Islam have been detained in India with special rights vides Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. As per the Indian Constitution and prevailing laws in India, there is no law to conserve Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. Moses, the founder of immorality on the pretext of religion, was the first person who moralized Booty, (Bible Deut. 20:14),  rape of women (Bible Isaiah 13:15-16) and subjugation of humanity through his religion Judaism and his domestic servant Jehovah on the pretext of ban on worshipping alien gods. (Bible Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5). Jesus, a pirate, improved the booty further. He moralized eating flesh of the son of man and drinking his blood (Bible, John 6:53) and slaughter of one who does not accept Jesus his ruler. (Bible, Luke, 19:27). Muhammad, another pirate, made Allah the owner of booty, (Koran 8:01, 41 and 69) killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17) rapist of women (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 and 70:30) and owner of the world. (Koran 2:255). Still Jesus and Muhammad provided limited right of booty to their followers. Property is power. Remaining in the hands of citizens, property prevents their subjugation and servitude. Therefore, Carl Marx invested property into the immoral, corrupt and usurper society. Democracy is blend of all above to eradicate Vedic culture and enslave one.

Now compare Ishwar with these Gods! While Jehovah has two brokers named Moses and Jesus, Allah has one alone named Muhammad? Any one can meet Ishwar direct after performing Yoga or Kundalini Jagran. Ishwar has no broker. (Gita 7:21). No one can meet Jehovah and Allah. So why should one worship these impotent and criminal gods named Jehovah and Allah, who make one slave, instigate one for murder, plunder, incest and rape of women of alien faiths and forbid one from worshiping a god of one’s choice, in lieu of Ishwar who gives one unfettered right to worship any god of one’s choice? Look! The notorious democracy calls this status of servility, liberty of faith and secularism! Therefore, the suggestion to these followers of criminal prophets is to relinquish their prophets and come into the fold of great and omnipresent Vedic culture. Do not believe in and do not accept religious servility for sex, booty and slave. Come to my fold, I would provide you liberty to worship a God of your own choice, says Ishwar in Gita, See Chapter 7 Shloka 21.

Through the very tailor compiled Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution by Jesus’ Congress, the criminal Muslims and Christians have been provided unfettered fundamental right to conserve their culture i.e. in fact right to liquidate or enslave every human being of the globe.


Victims of faiths


The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those, who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets become slaves of their prophets. By providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets got killed those who did not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world came under the control of the prophets. The prophets died and left behind their legacies to clerics and rulers. Why should one believe? Why not may one search Ishwar either by Yog or Kundalini Jagran? However, these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)?

If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits? If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves?

The fundamental Right to Property provided vide Article 31 of the Indian Constitution could not be snatched even by the Britons and the Constitution Committee. This Article 31 was amended by the dacoit Parliamentarians and upheld by the apex Court. Now the Article has been omitted from the Constitution since 20-06-1979.

Eradication of human race is imminent. Human race has lost wisdom. A Government that extorts taxes over 17% of the produce is extortionist. (Manusmriti 8:308). A religion that snatches liberty of worship cannot be secular. (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). The words, "Public Interest" and "Social Justice" are weapons to usurp the belongings of the haves. The end payers of corporate tax, VAT and even Income tax are poor people. The public servants, industrialists and traders are being forced to loot the poor and pass the booty to the rulers. (in the instant case Sonia). If one says that the tax is used for the welfare of poor, one is patently wrong. Bofor Chor Rajiv Gandhi, the so-called Mr. clean, had already told the nation in 1985 that 85% money of exchequer was being siphoned off by the intermediaries during his tenure. Now the position has further deteriorated; as per his son Rahul only 5% is reaching to the people. Look! Poor Jehovah has no share in booty. Poor Allah takes 20% only. (Koran 8:41). However, Pratibha and thief Antonia Maino and their servants gallop 95% of the exchequer as per the admission of the ex PM and his son Rahul of this dreaded Democracy!

I am providing a link having 2 orders of Allahabad High Court for the perusal of reader,

http://www.aryavrt.com/Home/1-wary-of-yogguru-2

Annexure 1 proves interpolation of revenue record by none other than the servants of Sonia, the super PM of India. Due to the constraints of section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the helpless judge, as per Annexure-2, could not punish the culprits. However, the poor judge suggested delivering me land in lieu of the land grabbed by the servants of land mafia Sonia. I am still ready to accept land of equal value. Could Jan-Lokpal override the Indian Constitution and Criminal Procedure Code and dare to do justice with me?

There are imminent persons in this agitation viz. ‘India against corruption’. One man may commit mistake. Every one cannot. I am writing eversince the agitation started, viz. April 05, 2011. Even after my warning, if these people do not respond, I can safely blame these people that they are scuttling the real war against corruption. They have sold their souls to Sonia, the dreaded tyrant, for their personal gains. They are immoral people and enemies of humanity.

I appeal every human being, including the public servants themselves, to help us fight the real enemy, the Indian Constitution. I know, I would be dragged in gallows like Shri Anupam Kher. Shri Kher admitted that he respects the Indian Constitution, however I hate predator and pirate Indian Constitution as it has been compiled and imposed upon the nation with lies, lies and lies and nothing else.

If the reader feels that my above comments are true, they may help us underhand and pass this message to maximum persons he can.

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi (Press Secretary),

Aryavrt Government

Dated; Delhi: Tuesday, May 24, 2011.

 

Comments