Home‎ > ‎

1-Wary of Yogguru


Read and forward it in the service of humanity.

Wary of Yogguru Ramdev

Yogguru Ramdev is new incarnation of Kalnemi.

Fight the source not the symptom.

Your moral:Article 39(c) and omitted Article 31 of the Indian Constitution are not corruption. Not sharing booty with cow and man-eater Elizabeth is alone corruption.

Indian Constitution


"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –

(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;"

197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.

 (1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction …

No one could dare to question the above Articles and section since 1950 A.D. Our Jagatguru questioned as such is languishing in jail.

As long as a dictator proletariat extorts money, loots citizens, commits scam and shares booty with Elizabeth and her tools and vassals, (s)he gets protection u/s 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While Elizabeth loots the reader through public servants by blackmailing the public servants, the section quoted above, ensures delivery of share in the booty to Elizabeth When booty is not shared with Elizabeth , the act of the dictator proletariat becomes corruption.

Suppose, all the parked black money in foreign banks and scam money returns to the exchequer, then, how the common man would benefit, when 95% of the money is being siphoned off by Elizabeth and her tools and vassals?

In fact Jan Lokpal would add another usurper of booty. However, omission of Article 39(c) and sec 197 and revival of Article 31 would ensure the real economic freedom of the citizens.

The above Article and section has reduced every citizen of India into sheep of sheep Elizabeth like cattle of peasant.

If anyone wants a government free of corruption, one ought to support kingdom founded on the tenets of Vedic Sanaatan Dharm, that stipulates,

Says Chhandogyopanishad, Pancham Prapathak, Ekadash Khand, 5th Shlok,

"N me steno janpade n kadarpo n mdyapo, nanahitagnirnavidvan n sweri swairini kutah?"

The emperor Ashwapati of Kaikeya nation told his guests, "In my kingdom, there is no thief, no unlearned man, no miser man, no one consumes wine,  without performing Agnihotram, no Grihastha takes meal, no one commits adultery as such adulterous woman is impossible."

Until 1835 A.D., Macaulay could not find a single thief or beggar in whole India.

Can one show us a nation with such ethics today?

Wrote Swamy Vivekanand,

"The more selfish a man, the more immoral he is. And so also with a race. That race which is bound down to itself has been the most cruel and the most wicked in the whole world. There has not been a religion that has clung to this dualism more than that founded by the Prophet of Arabia, and, there has not been a religion which has shed so much blood and been so cruel to other men. In the Koran there is the doctrine that a man who does not believe these teachings should be killed; it is a mercy to kill him! And the surest way to get to heaven, where there are beautiful houris and all sort of sense-enjoyment, is by killing these unbelievers. Think of the bloodshed there has been in consequence of such beliefs. Swamy Vivekanand Works Volume 2 page 352-353.

Scramble for Booty and slaves

There is scramble for booty and slaves around the whole world. Vedic Morals, which provide right to properties (Manusmriti 8:308)) and freedom of faith (Gita 7:21) are stumbling-blocks. Therefore, Christianity and Islam have been detained in India with special rights vides Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. As per the Indian Constitution and prevailing laws in India, there is no law to conserve Vedic Sanaatan Dharm. Moses, the founder of immorality on the pretext of religion, was the first person who moralized Booty, (Bible Deut. 20:14),  rape of women (Bible Isaiah 13:15-16) and subjugation of humanity through his religion Judaism and his domestic servant Jehovah on the pretext of ban on worshipping alien gods. (Bible Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5). Jesus, a pirate, improved the booty further. He moralized eating flesh of the son of man and drinking his blood (Bible, John 6:53) and slaughter of one who does not accept Jesus his ruler. (Bible, Luke, 19:27). Muhammad, another pirate, made Allah the owner of booty, (Koran 8:01, 41 and 69) killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17) rapist of women (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 and 70:30) and owner of the world. (Koran 2:255). Still Jesus and Muhammad provided limited right of booty to their followers. Property is power. Remaining in the hands of citizens, property prevents their subjugation and servitude. Therefore, Carl Marx invested property into the immoral, corrupt and usurper society. Democracy is blend of all above to eradicate Vedic culture and enslave one.

Now compare Ishwar with these Gods! While Jehovah has two brokers named Moses and Jesus, Allah has one alone named Muhammad? Any one can meet Ishwar direct after performing Yoga or Kundalini Jagran. Ishwar has no broker. (Gita 7:21). No one can meet Jehovah and Allah. So why should one worship these impotent and criminal gods named Jehovah and Allah, who make one slave, instigate one for murder, plunder, incest and rape of women of alien faiths and forbid one from worshipping a god of one’s choice, in lieu of Ishwar who gives one unfettered right to worship any god of one’s choice? Look! The notorious democracy calls this status of servility, liberty of faith and secularism! Therefore, the suggestion to these followers of criminal prophets is to relinquish their prophets and come into the fold of great and omnipresent Vedic culture. Do not believe in and do not accept religious servility for sex, booty and slave. Come to my fold, I would provide you liberty to worship a God of your own choice, says Ishwar in Gita, See Chapter 7 Shloka 21.

Through the very tailor compiled Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution by Jesus’ Congress, the criminal Muslims and Christians have been provided unfettered fundamental right to conserve their culture i.e. in fact right to liquidate or enslave every human being of the globe.

Victims of faiths

The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those, who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets become slaves of their prophets. By providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets got killed those who did not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world came under the control of the prophets. The prophets died and left behind their legacies to clerics and rulers. Why should one believe? Why not may one search Ishwar either by Yog or Kundalini Jagran? However, these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)?

If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits? If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves?

The fundamental Right to Property provided vide Article 31 of the Indian Constitution could not be snatched even by the Britons and the Constitution Committee. This Article 31 was amended by the dacoit Parliamentarians and upheld by the apex Court. Now the Article has been omitted from the Constitution since 20-06-1979.

Eradication of human race is imminent. Human race has lost wisdom. A Government that extorts taxes over 17% of the produce is extortionist. (Manusmriti 8:308). A religion that snatches liberty of worship cannot be secular. (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). The words, "Public Interest" and "Social Justice" are weapons to usurp the belongings of the haves. The end payers of corporate tax, VAT and even Income tax are poor people. The public servants, industrialists and traders are being forced to loot the poor and pass the booty to the rulers. (in the instant case Elizabeth ). If one says that the tax is used for the welfare of poor, one is patently wrong. Bofor Chor Rajiv Gandhi, the so-called Mr. clean, had already told the nation in 1985 that 85% money of exchequer was being siphoned off by the intermediaries during his tenure. Now the position has further deteriorated; as per his son Rahul only 5% is reaching to the people. Look! Poor Jehovah has no share in booty. Poor Allah takes 20% only. (Koran 8:41). However, financial racketeer Pratibha and thief Antonia Maino and their public servants gallop 95% of the exchequer as per the admission of the ex PM and his son Rahul of this dreaded Democracy!

I am giving a link containing 2 orders of Allahabad High Court for the perusal of readers,


Annexure 1 proves interpolation of revenue record by none other than the servants of Elizabeth, the super PM of India. Due to the constraints of section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the helpless judge, as per Annexure-2, could not punish the culprits. However, the poor judge suggested delivering me land in lieu of the land grabbed by the servants of Elizabeth. I am still ready to accept land of equal value. Could Jan-Lokpal override the Indian Constitution and Criminal Procedure Code and dare to do justice with me?

There are imminent persons in this agitation viz. ‘India against corruption’. One man may commit mistake. Every one cannot. I am writing eversince the agitation started, viz. April 05, 2011. Even after my warning, if these people do not respond, I can safely blame these people that they are scuttling the real war against corruption. They have sold their souls to Elizabeth, the dreaded tyrant, for their personal gains. They are immoral people and enemies of humanity.

I appeal every human being, including the public servants themselves, to help us fight the real enemy, here is the Indian Constitution. I know, I would be dragged in gallow like Shri Anupam Kher. Shri Kher admitted that he respects the Indian Constitution; however I hate the predator and pirate Indian Constitution as it has been compiled and imposed upon the nation with lies, lies and lies and nothing else.

If the reader feels that my above comments are true, they may help us underhand and pass this message to maximum persons (s)he can.

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi (Press Secretary),

Aryavrt Government

Dated; Delhi: Tuesday, May 24, 2011.

कालनेमि के अवतार योगगुरू रामदेव से सावधान

हमारे जगतगुरु स्वामी अमृतानंद देवतीर्थ के मुंह में गोमांस ठूसने वाले, साध्वी प्रज्ञा की रीढ़ की हड्डी तोड़ने वाले और हमारे सेनापति कर्नल पुरोहित का पैर तोड़ने वाले हेमंत करकरे और उसके साथियों को रामदेव ने शहीद घोषित किया है और ९० लाख रूपये ईनाम दिया है.:-




कांची कामकोटि के पीठाधीश्वर जयेन्द्र को जय ललिता ने दीपावली के दिन जेल भेज दिया. एलिजाबेथ ने हमारे १२ अधिकारियों को २००८ से जेल में बंद कर रखा है. क्यों कि हम रोम राज्य के विरोधी हैं. अजान, नमाज और मस्जिद के विरोधी हैं.

योगगुरू रामदेव के गुरु स्वामी शंकरदेव का १४ जुलाई, २००७ से पता नहीं है. योगगुरू से एलिजाबेथ ने यह भी नहीं जानना चाहा कि उनके गुरु कहाँ गए? क्यों?

अब जय ललिता फिर सत्ता में है. एलिजाबेथ से फोन पर जय ललिता की बात हो गई है. अतएव तमिलनाडु के सभी संतों महंथों की फांसी पक्की. तमिलनाडु के सभी मंदिर जेहोवा और अल्लाह की आज्ञा से तोड़ डाले जायेंगे. कोई मंदिर रह नहीं सकता. (बाइबल, व्यवस्था विवरण १२:१-३, अजान व कुरान १७:८१).

देगंगा में अपने सांसद हाजी नूरुल इस्लाम के नेतृत्व में नारियों का बलात्कार कराने के बदले में ममता बंगाल की मुख्य मंत्री बनी हैं. ममता एलिजाबेथ की सहयोगी हैं. अतः अब मुसलमानों को पश्चिम बंगाल के नारियों के बलात्कार की सुविधा है ममता के ओर से भी, एलिजाबेथ के जेहोवा के ओर से भी (बाइबल, याशयाह १३:१६) और अल्लाह के ओर से भी. (कुरान २३:६).


मै आप का ध्यान भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) की ओर आकर्षित करना चाहता हूँ. इस अनुच्छेद की तर्कपूर्ण विवेचना कीजिए. अनुच्छेद नीचे उद्धृत है:-

३९(ग)- आर्थिक व्यवस्था इस प्रकार चले कि जिससे धन व उत्पादन के साधनों का सर्वसाधारण के लिए अहितकारी संकेन्द्रण न हो" भारतीय संविधान के नीति निदेशक तत्व. अनुच्छेद ३९(ग).

इस अनुच्छेद ने नागरिक को किसान के पशु से भी निकृष्ट बना दिया है. राज्य के स्थापना का उद्देश्य प्रजा के जान-माल की रक्षा करना है. इस अनुच्छेद के अधीन राज्य प्रजा को स्वयं लूटता है. भारतीय संविधान के उद्देशिका में समाजवादी शब्द ३-१-१९७७ को जोड़ा गया और १९९१ में बिना संशोधन के अपना टनों सोना बिकने के बाद मुद्रा का २३% अवमूल्यन करके देश बाजारी व्यवस्था पर उतर आया. फिर भी यह अनुच्छेद ज्यों का त्यों बना हुआ है. इस अनुच्छेद के अनुसार व्यक्ति की स्थिति किसान के पशु से भी बुरी है. जिसकी सम्पत्ति चाहती हैएलिजाबेथ लूट लेती है. देखें नीचे:-

१९७. न्यायाधीशों और लोकसेवकों का अभियोजन- (१) जब किसी व्यक्ति पर, जो न्यायाधीश या मजिस्ट्रेट या ऐसा लोकसेवक है या था जिसे सरकार द्वारा या उसकी मंजूरी से ही उसके पद से हटाया जा सकेगा, अन्यथा नहीं, किसी ऐसे अपराध का अभियोग है जिसके बारे में यह अभिकथित हो कि वह उसके द्वारा तब किया गया था जब वह अपने पदीय कर्तव्य के निर्वहन में कार्य कर रहा था या जब उसका ऐसे कार्य करना तात्पर्यित था, तब कोई भी न्यायालय ऐसे अपराध का संज्ञान - ... सरकार की पूर्व मंजूरी से ही करेगा, अन्यथा नहीं; ...

उपरोक्त अनुच्छेद के अनुसार नागरिक के पास धन का संकेन्द्रण नहीं होना चाहिए. अतएव जनता की सम्पत्ति लूटना लोकसेवक के पदीय कर्तव्य का निर्वहन है. अतएव भ्रष्टाचार के लिए भारतीय संविधान उत्तर दायी है, लोकसेवक नहीं. यदि घोटाले की रकम मिल भी जाये तो भी राहुल के अनुसार रकम का ९५% एलिजाबेथ व उसके मातहत और उपकरण खा जायेंगे. लेकिन जनता को फिर भी कुछ नहीं मिलने वाला. उपरोक्त कानूनों से मै स्वयं पिछले २६ वर्षों से पीड़ित हूँ. भारतीय संविधान को रद्द करना जन हित में है. देखें नीचे लिंक पर:-


एलिजाबेथ द्वारा मनोनीत जो राज्यपाल भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) के संरक्षण, संवर्धन व पोषण की भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद १५९ के अधीन शपथ लेते है. दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९७ द्वारा जो राज्यपाल भ्रष्ट लोक सेवकों को संरक्षण देने के लिए विवश हैं और जजों ने भी जिस अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) को बनाये रखने की शपथ ली है, (भारतीय संविधान, तीसरी अनुसूची, प्रारूप ४ व ८), उनसे निकृष्ट भ्रष्टाचारी कौन हो सकता है?

दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९७ के अधीन संरक्षण दे कर जजों व लोकसेवकों को जनता को लूटने के लिए नियुक्त किया गया है| जब तक जज के अर्दली तारीख पर १० रूपये भेंट लेते हैं, इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायलय का रजिस्ट्रार तारीख देने के लिए ५०० रूपये और जब तक चौराहे पर ट्राफिक पुलिस वसूली करता है, इन्हें तब तक भ्रष्टाचार नहीं माना जाता जब तक एलिजाबेथ को हिस्सा मिलता हैं, उनको दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९७ के अधीन सोनिया अपने द्वारा मनोनीत राज्यपालों से संरक्षण दिलवाती है. हिस्सा न मिले तो एलिजाबेथ संरक्षण वापस ले लेती है. एलिजाबेथ ने मेरी भूमि लूटी है. एलिजाबेथ को जेल भेजो और मेरी भूमि मुझे वापस करो.

अन्ना के इस विजय से जनता को कुछ नहीं मिलने वाला. लोकपाल की आड़ में यह लूट का एकाधिकार छीनने की कवायद है. अतएव भ्रष्टाचार से मुक्ति चाहें तो संविधान के उपरोक्त अनुच्छेद ३९(ग) को संविधान से और धारा १९७ को दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता से हटाने और अनुच्छेद ३१ को पुनर्जीवित करने में हमारी सहायता करें.

पटेल को रजवाड़ों का राज्य और इंदिरा को प्रिवीपर्स छीनने में कानून के अभाव में भी कोई समय नहीं लगा. भारतीय संविधान के प्रभाव में सोनिया को रतन टाटा, मुकेश-अनिल अम्बानी आदि को लूटने से मात्र आर्यावर्त सरकार बचा सकती है| अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी.






Shiv Ashrey Tiwari and others ..........Petitioners


Ist . Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and others....Respdts.


Hon. Ravi S. Dhavan,J.

In compliance of your Lordship’s order, I checked annexure No. RA-5 and RA-6 on the record of writ Petition No. 9672/88 Sheo Asrey Tewari & anothers Vs. I Addl. District Judge & another in respect of plot no. 927 of village Turkamanpur Tappa Kasba Pargana Haveli Sadar Gorkhpur of the year 1323 fasli and 1295 fasli and found that conversation of the land from bigha to acres is correct.

In Khasra of village Turkmanpur(Collector’s record) of 1322 fasli, there are two sets of plots, against Plot no. 927, one set consists of sub -plot no,881, 882, 883 and 888. Another set consists of sub plot no. 875-876-877 and 878. In column no. 3 total area is written to be. 7.32 acre. But in Fard Mutabiqat (Comparative table) of 1322 fasli(Lekhpsl’s record) of village Turkmanpur plot no. 927 consists of sub-plots 881, 882,883,884,885, 875, 876, 877, 878 and 886. Thus, there addition of plot nos. 884 ,885 after plot no. 888 and 886 after plot no. 878 in Lekhpal’s record and both the records do not tally.

Against the original entry of plot no. 878, figure ‘8’was added on left side to make it read as ‘887’. Thereafter figure ‘8’ on the left side of original figure was cut. This gives impression that it can be read as 878 and 887 both. At page 99, there are cutting but no official has signed on such cutting.

As directed by your Lordship, Urdu, Hindi and English transliteration of the relevant records has been done, which is attached herewith for your Lordship’s kind perusal.

Submitted for kind perusal and order.


Joint Registrar ©



Sd. Illegible 3.9.90











Shiv Ashrey Tiwari and others ..........Petitioners


Ist . Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and others....Respdts.




Hon: Ravi S. Dhavan


The petitioner No. 2 in person, Mr. G.L. Tripathi Standing Counsel on behalf of state of U.P. Mr. S. Mandyan, Advocate for Respondent No. 4, holding the brief of Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate, Mr. K.B. Mathur, Advocate otherwise standing counsel, U.P. for Respondent No. 5.

The petitioner No. 2 has filed an affidavit with eleven annexures, which with the exception of one refer to the land records, otherwise in the possession of the district administration i.e. the State. A copy of this affidavit has already been delivered to counsel for the parties.

All the Respondents have jointly and unanimously prayed and requested the court that the matter be adjourned for today as they feel that the matter needs to be discussed with the Collector and District Magistrate, Gorakhpur. The reason for short adjournment was explained by learned counsel aforesaid. Regard being had to the record as of date, including certified copies of land records filed today, a short adjournment over the week-end was desired to obtain instructions. It was further contended that in consultation with the Collector/ District Magistrate party Respondents would seek instructions to suggest a proposal if another tract of land contiguous to that in the possession of petitioner, as of date, can be made available, subject to such orders as may be passed by this court, so that the interest of all parties can be protected. The request for adjournment, to let the Collector and District Magistrate consider the matter is not unreasonable. The matter is thus adjourned to be listed on August 18, 1989, as August 15 and 17 are public holidays.

After the aforesaid order was passed and at the rising of the court, Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate entered appearance to insist that the matter be taken up as unlisted tomorrow. The Court requested learned counsel to be briefed by his colleagues in this case on the proceedings as are on record, during his absence, as the request for adjournment may ultimately see a solution and end litigation. Learned counsel insisted that the District Magistrate Gorakhpur has nothing to do with the matter and that he must have his say.

As the matter cannot proceed beyond court hours in any case, place as unlisted tomorrow so that Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, Advocate, may have his say on whatever he contends. Let the record be before the court.

Sd. Ravi S. Dhavan, J.





AyodhyaP Tripathi,
May 2, 2015, 8:32 PM