196 CrPC

 

 

Section 196 of the CrPC

Purpose of compiling section 196 of the CrPC:

Section 196

It's evident that the Indian Constitution's as well as section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code’s General Strategic Plan to annihilate Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti has achieved great success within ever since the Indian Constitution is imposed.  Ultimately, the control of all knowledge of Christianity and Islam and the civilizational mission and jihad operation facilitates the attack against the Vedic Sanaatan Sanskriti and effectively prevents any counter to expansionism of Christianity and Islam.  We are well on our way to being subdued by Christianity and Islam that has cleverly silenced us.

We, Vedic Panthies are proud to belong to Vedic Sanaatan Dharm, which has taught the world both tolerance and universal acceptance. Liberty is our birth right. No one has right to snatch our liberty. We are proud to belong to a nation, which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of earth. While Aryans’ Vedic Culture provided shelter to every faith, Christianity and Islam have annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation might takes centuries, but once Christianity and Islam are ascendant they never fail. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct. While vultures eat dead corpses, Christians eat flesh of living son of the man! (Bible John 6:53). Both Christians and Muslims are protected by the dreaded Indian Constitution. [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution].

The Indian Constitution is booby trap. It gives unfettered fundamental right to Christianity and Islam to conserve their culture of murder and plunder.

That one, who has seen vultures, might have knowledge that perching of a single vulture upon a green tree is more than enough to annihilate the tree. One Muhammad eradicated all the three, his host tribes of Madina, viz. Banu Qainuka, Banu Nazir and Banu Quraiza. One Columbus reached America and annihilated the entire 100 million Red Indians and their Maya culture. One Max Muller annihilated Aryans’ Veds and one Macaulay annihilated Aryans Gurukul system and Sanskrit language. What these millions of vulture Christians and Muslims, detained by criminal Congress Party of Jesus and imposter M.K. Gandhi, the father of Pakistan, would do with Aryans is any body’s guess. UOI is in league with these vultures and is hell bent to eradicate Vedic culture. Now these vultures are after Vedic SANATAN Culture. Join Aryavrt to eliminate these cultures else be ready for doom. The purpose of compiling Section 196 of the CrPC is to defend these criminal cultures and their followers either by hook or by crook.

We never gave to ourselves the Indian Constitution

The fraud of the Indian Constitution starts with the preamble quoted below,

IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November 1949, (WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA) do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

This is fraud. The people, who compiled the Constitution, were not elected by the people of Bharat after transfer of power by Jesus. No referendum or plebiscite was arranged to obtain consent of the people about the body of the Indian Constitution. Then how the people of Bharat enacted, adopted and given to themselves this (booby trap) guide of usurpers, murderers, rapists and secession mongers?

PART III

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

“Cultural and Educational Rights

‘’29. Protection of Interests of Minorities-(1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territories of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script, or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.’’

The one of the real meanings of CULTURE as mentioned in Webster Dictionary is, 'the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group'

DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

"39. Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State – The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing –

(c) That the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;"

Citizens are celebrating the doomsday viz. Jan. 26 since 1950, the day on which they lost their right to property, [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31], right of life, faith, culture and nation. (Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution). Has the reader courage to protest the presence of such violent and murderous rulers in Bharat? The Indian Constitution has compelled the Indian Judiciary to accept Jehovah and Allah Gods, Bible and Koran religious books, mosques and churches worship places and Azaan call for prayer. (AIR 1985 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, 104). For their (rulers) sustenance, power and pelf, judges have no choice than upholding their (Muslims' and Christians') fundamental rights mentioned above. (Article 60 of the Indian Constitution, Article 159 of the Indian Constitution and Schedule III of the Indian Constitution.). Citizens are celebrating 15th August 1947, viz. the day of rape of their women, hounding them out of their mother land, vivisection of their motherland and plunder of their ancestral properties by the so called secular and peace loving Muslims on the command of their dreaded satan Allah, on the instance of pimp Mountbatten, who delivered his wife Advina to Jawahar Lal Nehru in lieu of cheating Aryans.

Want to survive? Join Vedic Panth.

The section 196 of the CrPC is being reproduced below,

 Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence.

(1) No court shall take cognizance of-

(a) Any offence punishable under Chapter VI or under section 153A, 1[section 295A or sub-section (1) of section 505] of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or punishable under sections 153/295 of the Indian Penal Code

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, or

(c) Any such abetment, as is described in section 108A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), except with the previous sanction of the central Government or of the State Government.

2[(1A) No court shall take cognizance of -

(a) Any offence punishable under section 153B or sub-section (2) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) of section 505 of the Indian Panel Code (45 of 1860), or
(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence,

Except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or of the State Government or of the District Magistrate.]

(2) No court shall take cognizance of the offence of any criminal conspiracy punishable under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), other than a criminal conspiracy to commit 3[an offence] punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, unless the State Government or the District Magistrate has consented in writing to the initiation of the proceeding:

Provided that where the criminal conspiracy is one to which the provisions of section 195 apply, no such consent shall be necessary.

(3) The Central Government or the State Government may, before according sanction 4[under sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A) and the District Magistrate may, before according sanction under sub-section (1A)] and the State Government or the District Magistrate may, before giving consent under sub-section (2), order a preliminary investigation by a police officer not being below the rank of Inspector, in which case such police officer shall have the powers referred to in sub-section (3) of section 155.

1. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3, for "section 153B, section 295A or section 505" (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

2. Ins. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3 (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

3. Subs. by Act 45 of 1979, sec. 16, for "a cognizable offence" (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).

4. Subs. by Act 63 of 1980, sec. 3, for "under sub-section (1)" (w.e.f. 23-9-1980).

 

  (3) The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of subsection (2) shall apply to such class or category of the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order as may be specified therein, whenever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of that sub-section will apply as if lot the expression "Central Government" occurring therein, the expression "State Government were substituted.
2[(3A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a State while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a Proclamation issued trader clause (I) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.
(3B) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Code or any other law, it is here by declared that any sanction accorded by the State Government or any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of August, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991, receives the assent of the President, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in the State, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the Central Government in such matter to accord sanction and for the court to take cognizance thereon.]
(4) The Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, may determine the person by whom, the manner in which, and the offence or offences for which, the prosecution of such Judge, Magistrate or public servant is to be conducted, and may specify the court before which the trial is to be held.

1. Added by Act 43 of 1991, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991)

2. Ins. by Act 43 of 1991, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991)

 ++++++++++

I am being tried u/s 153A of the IPC. I am reproducing the section below,

1[153A. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.—(1) whoever—

“(a) By words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or” 

“(b) Commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility,…

"Shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.”

"153-B. Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration. - (1) whoever, by words either spoken or written or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise,--

"(a) makes or publishes any imputation that any class of persons cannot, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established or uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, or

"(b) asserts, counsels, advises, propagates or publishes that any class of persons shall, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, be denied or deprived of their rights as citizens of India, or

"(c) makes or publishes any assertion, counsel, plea or appeal concerning the obligation of any class of persons, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language, or regional group or caste or community, and such assertion, counsel, plea or appeal causes or is likely to cause disharmony or feelings of enmity or hatred or ill-will between such members and other persons,

"Shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

That I am reproducing other sections 96, 99 and 102 of the Indian Penal Code below,

Section 96. Things done in private defence

Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.

  (iii) Where the right of private defence is pleaded, the defence must be a reasonable and probable version satisfying the cast that the harm caused by the accused was necessary for either warding off the attack or for forestalling the further reasonable apprehension from the side of the accused. The burden of establishing the plea of self-defence is on the accused and the burden stands discharged by showing preponderance of probabilities in favour of that plea on the basis of the material on record; Rizan v. State of Chattisgarh, AIR 2003 SC 976. Sonia and Hamid are deputed by the Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dhram and I am engaged in defending our Vedic Sanaatan Dhram.

http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/29943/

+++

Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Section 99. Act against which there is no right of private defence

There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonable cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law.

In the instance case the public servants themselves are protecting and defending our killer Christians and Muslims.

There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonable cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law.

There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.

Where is the question of asking for protection, when the public servants themselves are defending our killers for their sustenance, power, pelf and financial status?

Section 102. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of the body

The right of private defence of the body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises from an attempt or threat to commit the offence though the offence may not have been committed; and it continues as long as such apprehension of danger to the body continues.

Section 105. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of property:

The Right of private defence of property commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences.

The right of private defence of property against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the property has been recovered.

The right of private defence of property against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint of as long as the fear of instant death or of instant hurt or of instant personal restraint continues.

The right of private defence of property against criminal trespass or mischief continues as long as the offender continues in the commission of criminal trespass or mischief.

The right of private defence of property against house-breaking by night continues as long as the house-trespass which has been begun by such house-breaking continues.

Now, the reader is requested to read the link below,

http://www.aryavrt.com/azaaneng

According to above sections the Right of private defense of body and property of Vedic Panthies commenced since 1860 A.D. and would continue until Christianity and Islam are eradicated!

+++

Notwithstanding the right of private defense, upon the sanction of LG, judiciary is harassing me since 1996 and now the P.O. has refused to accept my written argument in the form of affidavit.

Now the very judiciary, which could not see violation of my right of private defense under sections 102 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code, would sentence me u/s 153A of the Indian Penal Code: Although the very judiciary cannot try an Imaam for abusing her faith under the very section, without sanction from LG under Section 196 of the CrPC. I feel pity for judiciary.

 

Comments